Jason Garrett must go if this team wants a SB

[Clove]

Actually I do remember a few last year which should have been the start of you realizing Garrett is the issue, not Romo. Maybe you have figured it out, maybe not, but you will soon if we stick with Garrett and you see Dak failing just like Romo. You got a big taste of this just this week.

Would be nice to see both go.

 

[cml750]

Obviously, otherwise you would not have replied to a day old thread.

lol, I have not looked at this board since very, very early Monday morning. You know some of us have other things to do in life, like work. When I see a post like yours that is so bad, it begs for a response.

 

[p_tubbs]

lol, I have not looked at this board since very, very early Monday morning. You know some of us have other things to do in life, like work. When I see a post like yours that is so bad, it begs for a response.

Regardless of why, you responded. I will tell you like I told the other guy, if you don't like Garrett, the way things ended, or the way things are going, then cheer for another team. It's that simple. Jerry, Stephen, or Jason, could care less what you think. You run NOTHING at the Star. I support them regardless of outcome without complaints.

 

[p_tubbs]

Regardless of why, you responded. I will tell you like I told the other guy, if you don't like Garrett, the way things ended, or the way things are going, then cheer for another team. It's that simple. Jerry, Stephen, or Jason, could care less what you think. You run NOTHING at the Star. I support them regardless of outcome without complaints.

By the way, I believe being a tax attorney qualifies as work... I think.

 

[cml750]

Regardless of why, you responded. I will tell you like I told the other guy, if you don't like Garrett, the way things ended, or the way things are going, then cheer for another team. It's that simple. Jerry, Stephen, or Jason, could care less what you think. You run NOTHING at the Star. I support them regardless of outcome without complaints.

You cheer for another team if you can't stand real fans wanting a better coach. Please open your eyes and take off the rose colored glasses for a moment and actually look at reality for a change.

 

[superonyx]

Our just score a TD instead of a FG in the red zone.

If it was that easy we would just score 50 every game and not worry about it.

Or maybe we could try and hold a teams offense under 34 points...you know like we did EVERY game this season expect the game that mattered the most. When you give up your season high points against you can't blame your offense that scored 31 points on 6 of 9 possessions.

 

[p_tubbs]

You cheer for another team if you can't stand real fans wanting a better coach. Please open your eyes and take off the rose colored glasses and take a moment to look at reality.

Reality? The reality is that I bet you or the other idiot wasn't saying this during the season. The reality is that Garrett isn't going anywhere nor should he but you certainly can.

 

[cml750]

Would be nice to see both go.

I am very happy we were lucky enough to luck into another superstar QB in Dak but that does not make Romo less of a QB. Last year proved Garrett can not win without a superstar at the QB position. Garrett ruined Romo's career. He ruined Dak's first season. Only time will tell where we go from here but the past makes it look REALLY bad for Dak.

 

[cml750]

Reality? The reality is that I bet you or the other idiot wasn't saying this during the season. The reality is that Garrett isn't going anywhere nor should he but you certainly can.

I don't doubt you are right about being stuck with Garrett. Drunks make bad decisions all of the time. Soon you will get on the can Garrett bandwagon after a few more years of failure in the postseason.

 

[Idgit]

If Garrett wins coach of the year, the ones who voted for him are the ones who will look stupid. Sadly for them, I think they voted before Garrett showed us what he was again in the last game.

Yeah, that's usually how it is with awards like these. The people who hand them out are clueless, and the fans who don't like it because they like to second guess any decision in any game and pretend the outcome would have been successful if the coach had done the opposite of what he actually did are the ones who get it right.

Didn't we go through something similar to this when the fans thought we couldn't possibly win with Garrett and anybody who disagreed was insane and then the organization extended him for 6 years, $30MM or whatever?

At some point you have to think that the predictions from the ones who don't look foolish would start to mirror what actually happens in real life, wouldn't you? Maybe not. Maybe you're right and the players and staff and the people handing out the coaching awards and the major contract extensions are the ones who have it wrong.

 

[cml750]

Yeah, that's usually how it is with awards like these. The people who hand them out are clueless, and the fans who don't like it because they like to second guess any decision in any game and pretend the outcome would have been successful if the coach had done the opposite of what he actually did are the ones who get it right.

Didn't we go through something similar to this when the fans thought we couldn't possibly win with Garrett and anybody who disagreed was insane and then the organization extended him for 6 years, $30MM or whatever?

At some point you have to think that the predictions from the ones who don't look foolish would start to mirror what actually happens in real life, wouldn't you? Maybe not. Maybe you're right and the players and staff and the people handing out the coaching awards and the major contract extensions are the ones who have it wrong.

Idgit my friend, the predictions from the ones who do not look foolish have come true. We failed miserably last year, if you need a reminder, and we failed again just this week in clock management, something that Garrett has yet to learn despite years of OJT. How long do you need to see how bad Garrett is??? Have you not seen enough yet?? How many more failed years with the same mistakes will it take??

 

[ghst187]

Garretts a great guy and connects well to the players. The problem is he is a terrible game planner, and horrible game manager which has is what keeps us hitting a glass ceiling. As much as I don't like him, Belechick probably takes this team to a 16-0 record and wins the SB.

 

[Idgit]

Idgit my friend, the predictions from the ones who do not look foolish have come true. We failed miserably last year, if you need a reminder, and we failed again just this week in clock management, something that Garrett has yet to learn despite years of OJT. How long do you need to see how bad Garrett is??? Have you not seen enough yet?? How many more failed years with the same mistakes will it take??

Those predictions only have come true if you buy the line that a coach that doesn't make it to a championship game or a Superbowl is necessarily a bad coach. I don't think that's a line that most people buy. It's a line that angry fans buy the week after a loss, and then gradually come slinking back as they realize that clock management wasn't really the issue last week at all. (For the record, I do think we had several coaching issues last week, I just think the time management second guessing had almost nothing to do with the loss).

I don't think this team has failed under Jason Garrett. I think a lot of people don't grasp the difference between 'not good' and 'not good enough.' Everybody agrees we haven't been good enough. I think most reasonable people also agree the roster has gotten better under Garrett and the organization more stable and not the opposite. The reality is, it's hard to win it all in the NFL. When you get a guy who gets you into contention--especially when there are obvious personnel limitations yet to address with an organization that's proving itself actually able to address personnel limitations--it's a hard sell that that guy should be replaced because some fans would have run it when he clocked it or thrown it when he ran it.

 

[Idgit]

Garretts a great guy and connects well to the players. The problem is he is a terrible game planner, and horrible game manager which has is what keeps us hitting a glass ceiling. As much as I don't like him, Belechick probably takes this team to a 16-0 record and wins the SB.

For the record, if Belichick wants to come here, we should take him.

 

[cml750]

Those predictions only have come true if you buy the line that a coach that doesn't make it to a championship game or a Superbowl is necessarily a bad coach. I don't think that's a line that most people buy. It's a line that angry fans buy the week after a loss, and then gradually come slinking back as they realize that clock management wasn't really the issue last week at all. (For the record, I do think we had several coaching issues last week, I just think the time management second guessing had almost nothing to do with the loss).

I don't think this team has failed under Jason Garrett. I think a lot of people don't grasp the difference between 'not good' and 'not good enough.' Everybody agrees we haven't been good enough. I think most reasonable people also agree the roster has gotten better under Garrett and the organization more stable and not the opposite. The reality is, it's hard to win it all in the NFL. When you get a guy who gets you into contention--especially when there are obvious personnel limitations yet to address with an organization that's proving itself actually able to address personnel limitations--it's a hard sell that that guy should be replaced because some fans would have run it when he clocked it or thrown it when he ran it.

I replied to you in a PM. Good day my friend!!!!

 

[TheHerd]

For the record, if Belichick wants to come here, we should take him.

If Jerry offered 30M, would he come? I have zero doubt we'd win a few Super Bowls if he came to Dallas.

 

[Dodger12]

Regardless of why, you responded. I will tell you like I told the other guy, if you don't like Garrett, the way things ended, or the way things are going, then cheer for another team. It's that simple. Jerry, Stephen, or Jason, could care less what you think. You run NOTHING at the Star. I support them regardless of outcome without complaints.

Hey, if you don't like what I or others post, go troll another board. And who said anything about the Star? Who cares? Why even bring it up? You hoping someone gives you a job or something?

But I do get it with you. IF you played any sports, you were just happy to be on the team and maybe Daddy played golf with the coach or was part of the same country club to help get you on the squad. Winning didn't matter because you were never part of the process from the sideline, dugout or bench. You could wear the jersey on Fridays, smile and celebrate if your team won but could never be blamed if they lost. When others played, they cared about winning. You just go on without any complaints and regardless of outcome. It's why you're a tax attorney (according to you) and not a trial attorney where winning matters.

 

[erod]

I have been a fan since 72 and think the OP is 100% correct. Actually, I do not see how any rational person who understands football could see otherwise.

You need to learn football.

Lol, good Lord.

 

[Clove]

I am very happy we were lucky enough to luck into another superstar QB in Dak but that does not make Romo less of a QB. Last year proved Garrett can not win without a superstar at the QB position. Garrett ruined Romo's career. He ruined Dak's first season. Only time will tell where we go from here but the past makes it look REALLY bad for Dak.

If we lose next year, there won't be a Garrett, thank God.

 

[cowboyblue22]

i think that there are several coaches in this league who are capable of getting a team to the playoffs like andy reid and marvin lewis and others but they are and there team is just not good enough to win there I think that garrett is in that list of coaches just don't think he Is good enough to win in the playoffs he can get there just cant win when he does he Is just not good enough