pitt33
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,154
- Reaction score
- 7,164
Yep.Deuce Vaughn would be my short yardage/goal line back.
He could launch himself over the pile as if he was bouncing off a mini trampoline.
Yep.Deuce Vaughn would be my short yardage/goal line back.
It's charity at this point...I can’t remember an example of a team cutting a player, getting hit with dead cap from the contract, and then re-signing that player in the same off-season.
Why would we do this? He refused to re-do his deal, so now that we’ve taken the dead cap hit and his camp realizes he has no market, we’re going to shell out more money to him?
Make it make sense.
A guy that can make the big play, we have no interest in
A guy that can't make the big play, sure why not
Zeke is certainly worth bringing back for a price that fits the role. Currently the backs we have to replace him are downgrades.A lot of fans just latch onto "sound bites" without any evidence to back them up. It can be a statistic like averaging 3.8 YPC to determine that a back isn't good for anything. Never mind the amount of short-yardage and TD success, which does have value.
I'm for re-signing Elliott, if the price is right, and then having a true open competition. Frankly, if someone like Luepke looks like a better short-yardage back and using a tandem of Pollard/Vaughn looks better than a Pollard/Elliott tandem, then he should be cut. I don't know if the team would do that (which is the only concern), but I'm for having options then eliminating the options based on who is best. I prefer players being beaten out for roles rather than the job just being given to them because you don't have any other options.
Only people that talk about "great pass blocking backs" and "short yardage backs" are Cowboys fans. Nowhere in the NFL do fans talk of backs like that.That's bs, they certainly could go either way with him and having a reliable short yardage back isn't a thorn in the side.
I guess there are some who don't think the salary cap is real.A guy that can make the big play, we have no interest in
That is because you are blind.Yeah it’s like it’s a fear people have of bringing him back. At the end of the day I just had an issue with his salary. I don’t see a problem with him as a short yardage back.
Micah will just throw him over the line.Deuce Vaughn would be my short yardage/goal line back.
Zeke is now a scrub like that most of the backups on our roster. However that doesnt mean we should bring back the scrub Zeke. At least the scrubs we now have know their place.Zeke is certainly worth bringing back for a price that fits the role. Currently the backs we have to replace him are downgrades.
ReportedThat is because you are blind.
He did not refuse to redo his contract. Dallas made no offer too. They said it felt insulting to ask to take a big pay cut. And was better to release him at that point.I can’t remember an example of a team cutting a player, getting hit with dead cap from the contract, and then re-signing that player in the same off-season.
Why would we do this? He refused to re-do his deal, so now that we’ve taken the dead cap hit and his camp realizes he has no market, we’re going to shell out more money to him?
Make it make sense.
That was a nice way of saying we want you gone.He did not refuse to redo his contract. Dallas made no offer too. They said it felt insulting to ask to take a big pay cut. And was better to release him at that point.
I believe the Eagles did those with Fletcher Cox. Released him to get rid of the big contract and resigned him later on.
I think last year or two years ago.
Elliot has no future.
Therefore he will be a thorn in the Cowboys side because Jerry can’t quit him.
Jerry is at his end and unfortunately we are nearing dumb kid time