kskboys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,973
- Reaction score
- 50,826
Yes, Jerry, we tried to tell you that when your offseason signing was a guy who can't stay healthy and your 2nd round pick was a luxury pick.
Who was a reachMaybe should have went that way in the 2nd vs reaching for a position where we had depth.
1 oft injured vet, and 2 late round rooks. Gotta get the info straight, dude.They added 2 rookies and 2 veterans. They signed Martin and Steele. What exactly were they supposed to do?
I know you meant all!!! Including me. And yourself.I bet some of yall just like to hear yourself talk and see yourself text smh
The one they got from the Giants.1 oft injured vet, and 2 late round rooks. Gotta get the info straight, dude.
Who is this other vet besides ChuChu?
Sorry fella, but I meant what I saidI know you meant all!!! Including me. And yourself.
As did I.Sorry fella, but I meant what I said
Do we know that they can’t reach out to him if we need him? Do we know that?It's like people A. Ignore what we do and B. Think quality OL depth grows on trees
The one who is desperately trying to make a roster as a backup C and is slated for our PS? Might not be NFL talent. Sure you want to count him as a positive?The one they got from the Giants.
Who did we cut? I must have missed that.No one can argue against a 'Maybe'... But it's a huge maybe given Tyron (history, age), Zach (age), Steele (recovery)... I also realize we have drafted 2 guards in the 2-3rd rounds that we cut and are starting for very good teams...
Specifically a center and guard... we have depth gaps at center and guard...
Lol, Jerry still doesn't fall asleep at the wheel.Do we know that they can’t reach out to him if we need him? Do we know that?
You make a good point here and when all is said and done, it may very well turn out similarly. The difference I see here is that while Torrance was touted in the media as a top prospect, it turned out that he slid quite a bit from projections. That leads me to believe that he was overvauled by pundits as opposed to front offices. When they took Taco over TJ, it seemed very clear that they were only focused on scheme fit and forced the pick. With this, It seemed like maybe they just did not like what they saw in Torrence as a player.I understand that. But that is how you end up with taco Charlton over TJ Watt
That is the most important question right now on Philadelphia...and I would throw into Cowboy interest, San Francisco. I see NFL players that are good. But for now, I still just see good.Here is a serious question, because I don’t know. What team has “good” depth at the OLine position. Philly’s & KC’s OLine is supposed two of the best, I looked at their depth and with my very limited knowledge, they look very weak also.
Again a someone help me out.
The defensive end position is now strong and deep for Dallas. That now is not a failure event.You make a good point here and when all is said and done, it may very well turn out similarly. The difference I see here is that while Torrance was touted in the media as a top prospect, it turned out that he slid quite a bit from projections. That leads me to believe that he was overvauled by pundits as opposed to front offices. When they took Taco over TJ, it seemed very clear that they were only focused on scheme fit and forced the pick. With this, It seemed like maybe they just did not like what they saw in Torrence as a player.
2014 on I agree. People are down on the oline too much. It's been elite to top 10 every year 14-23 besides 18 when they had a lot of injuries. So I see the concern for depth there.This fanbase has been spoiled since the early 2010's.
Watching the Dolphins for 20 something years and that's a team that struggles to land 2-3 good linemen most years, let alone 5 which this team has now, healthy.
And, now it's expected to have legit backups without any warts in their game.