Jerry on Garrett: Not Impressed

JIGGYFLY

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,500
Reaction score
61
Are you kidding me??? The Skins makeshift DBa outplayed our all world DBa last night. The Skins swarmed the ball all night (2 strips & one robbery). We are no where near the ball even when it's deflected in the air begging to be picked.

BTW...I don't know how to spell ajinda.

What does any of that have to do with overall team talent and only giving up 16 points after 3 TO's says a lot about how the defense played.

So no I am not kidding you.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,278
Reaction score
13,866
Jim Tomsula must be a friggin genius at motivation. One year and he has the Niners with Gabbert and a completely depleted roster as 4-8 just like us. In a tougher division.

As I said above. What about Todd Bowles. 4-12 last year. 8-8 year before and now 7-5 as a first year coach with the pupu platter of Ryan "Kris Kringle" Fitzpatrick and Geno Smith at QB. Hard working non-quitters I bet.
 

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,193
Reaction score
23,506
Jerry finally realizing Garrett brings nothing to the table

We won on will and not tactical mastery is code for we won on talent alone and not coaching

That is only what 90% of the fans have been saying for years

It's pretty huge that Jerrah said that. It's not something he usually says.

It usually takes him years to admit a mistake - he discovered early on that Garrett was an in-game dummy but trotted out the learning on the job excuse because he likes Red personally. Jerrah also figured Romo would lead them to the Promised Land and Garrett was the guy to head the team as it happened. With Romo out he sees it wasn't a 50-50 dealio, but that Romo was the only thing keeping Garrett from being an utter failure. He sees how mediocre to bad the teams we lost to are - Falcons, Saints, Bucs - and he saw how clueless Garrett continues to be at the end of games.

It has sunk in to Jerrah that dangit once Romo is gone (and that may be sooner rather than later) we are screwed with Garrett running this. He can no longer blame assistants and coordinators and play musical chairs with them.

Keep it up Jerrah. Admit the gamble on Garrett came up snake eyes and move on. Please.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
Tactical Mastery

Parity

Hmmmm

Is the light bulb flickering?
 

TheDude

McLovin
Messages
12,178
Reaction score
10,637
I said we don't know what was said, and we don't.

yet your entire stance is based on not knowing. that is pathetic. you can hold onto irrational opinions, but I call people out for them. don't like it - too frigging bad!

So IF it was said, a direct order was disobeyed twice. Either way it was an error, your rebuttle scenario being deliberate player disregard.
 

TheDude

McLovin
Messages
12,178
Reaction score
10,637
Baltimore game when he did not call a TO after having all the receivers run long routes and Romo dumped it off.

Thereby leading to a long FG try that was missed leading to a loss in OT.

Also not calling a play to line Baily up on the right hash when his kicks had been drifting left all game.

remember that wash game . screen to Choice with :04 left in the half - if only Hall would have stripped and returned it for 6, we may have made it to midfild
 

JIGGYFLY

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,500
Reaction score
61
remember that wash game . screen to Choice with :04 left in the half - if only Hall would have stripped and returned it for 6, we may have made it to midfild

Yeah that was egregious as well, I think Garrett was into full on sabotage mode.
 

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,193
Reaction score
23,506
remember that wash game . screen to Choice with :04 left in the half - if only Hall would have stripped and returned it for 6, we may have made it to midfild

I believe the end of the Tampa game this year featured Garrett not calling TOs earlier when the Bucs were driving in to take the lead. We could have possibly got the ball back with more time than a couple of desperation heaves.

Maybe not the most shining example but so many to choose from.

I'd call that one a B-side single to his Greatest Hits
 

canters

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,676
Reaction score
2,124
JJ has always viewed himself as a coach. Not a good thing that he is right on here.
 

TwoCentPlain

Numbnuts
Messages
15,169
Reaction score
11,084
On the plus side, it seems like whatever is ailing Garrett this year has also finally spread to all the head coaches of the NFC East. Coughlin can at least claim old age for his senile coaching moves. If it weren't for Coughlin's stupidity, the Giants would have clinched the division weeks ago. Kelly first started exhibiting symptoms of NFC-East-Head-Coaching-Insanity disease during the off-season. Trading for Bradford and signing Murray and continuing to try to fit that square peg into the round hole. Let's corner the RB free agent market and then throw the ball a lot, horribly throw it a lot, to stinky WRs who drop the ball a lot. But win with special teams. Gruden has probably his best QB on the bench with no logical reason why he is even on the team. Who better to run your scout team than the 2nd pick in the draft 4 years ago?
 

TheDude

McLovin
Messages
12,178
Reaction score
10,637
You need to read the definition too. Actually read it. Just because you correctly guess something doesn't have anything to do with it. It's hindsight.

95%
https://live.numberfire.com/nfl/6313?play=177

95%
https://live.numberfire.com/nfl/6313?play=177

95%
https://live.numberfire.com/nfl/6313?play=177

Seeing as how this stat is right in my Trading Value-at-Risk wheelhouse, kicking a 20 yarder with 0:03 time is around 99.5%. Assuming 252 business trading days, 95% would happen around 13 times per year. Conversely, the 20 yard FG is about a 4 sigma and may only happen 1 time a year.

In Football. 95% is 1 out of every 20 games vs statistaically insignificant probability.


95% sounds great, but no where near foolproof enough for most conclusions (FDA, etc, etc.)
 

CapnCook

Well-Known Member
Messages
649
Reaction score
724
Garrett doesn't learn from it. In his mind every game this year was done "the right way". He even said as much in the midst of the losing streak, something to the effect of we will continue to do things the right way and eventually the results will follow. He doesn't view this as learning as he goes like Jerrah hoped. Garrett has his controlled, limited process that involves very little in the way of Xs and Os and adjustments, just big picture philosophies.

He has an entitled elitist view and thinks he is some guru who can will a bunch of kindergarten kids to victory in a man's game.

Yes. I have some friends who worry about the development of their small children, and I tell them to hold their concerns because I have seen so many late bloomers in life. I am a patient person. And then there are the friends who have certain older children, and I just prefer to avoid that conversation with them all together and hope they figure it out and use that college nest egg on themselves. I'm glad to see Garrett's "Daddy" is starting to get it.

I will still contend that Garret has had success here, though. Three out of four his drafts went to offensive lineman when there had been none before in Jerry's tenure. That has to account for something. He has been able to bend Jerry's ear like no other. But now that may be gone, too.
 

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,193
Reaction score
23,506
Yes. I have some friends who worry about the development of their small children, and I tell them to hold their concerns because I have seen so many late bloomers in life. I am a patient person. And then there are the friends who have certain older children, and I just prefer to avoid that conversation with them all together and hope they figure it out and use that college nest egg on themselves. I'm glad to see Garrett's "Daddy" is starting to get it.

I will still contend that Garret has had success here, though. Three out of four his drafts went to offensive lineman when there had been none before in Jerry's tenure. That has to account for something. He has been able to bend Jerry's ear like no other. But now that may be gone, too.

I always said he could be a front office type guy, personnel etc.

But Garrett has no bidness on that sideline.
 
Top