Jerry on Garrett: Not Impressed

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,085
Reaction score
27,182
I just watched Jerry's post game interview and he doesn't appear to be to happy with the win, didn't smile or laugh one time, looked totally pissed

Either he is pissed at the botched coaching or he wanted to tank, maybe Jerry is a fake fan.......LOL
 

Oh_Canada

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,083
Reaction score
4,222
JG NOT GOING ANYWHERE, jerry not running anything but his mouth. so if you are listening to him , I feel sorry for you

So we should listen to the guy who doesn't own the team instead? What he said was very unlike Jerry especially after a win.

I won't be surprised JJ moves Garrett into the front office if Clay moves on and brings in Payton.
 

TheDude

McLovin
Messages
12,178
Reaction score
10,637
I believe the end of the Tampa game this year featured Garrett not calling TOs earlier when the Bucs were driving in to take the lead. We could have possibly got the ball back with more time than a couple of desperation heaves.

Maybe not the most shining example but so many to choose from.

I'd call that one a B-side single to his Greatest Hits

no this is true there are many, many others that may not occur with the final 40 seconds. the TOs or lack of prior to the 2 minute warning is just as important.

I think not deferring every time you win a toss and is also statistically bad
 

kevm3

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,826
Reaction score
12,862
I think Jerry can see the reality of the situation. I wouldn't be surprised if he wanted to tank, because he realizes that if Romo goes out again, there is a very real possibility of multiple years of what we're seeing now on offense. We could very well be in a Houston Texans type of situation where we're always scrambling for a qb.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,547
Reaction score
27,837
It does match is the problem. So not getting the best out of your team while your QB is out and not winning a game because of your game plan IS Impressive?

How is Kubiak a boogeyman? The narrative fits almost identically and I have been on both boards and have seen both cities in the midst of it. But hey knock yourself out, its easier to sit back and pick it apart with nothing concrete except "our guys play hard".....as in the other 31 teams probably don't work as hard for their coach.

Guess some coaches like Todd Bowles are just quick learners to the Tao of Stacking and Processes since they can come in Year 1 and win with Fitzpatrick

What narrative fits directly? I'm supposed to go figure that out? Do you at least have a single coherent post that I can read that explains it. All I see you do is reflexively repeating that you have.

I have a counter narrative. There is a group of people that get mad reflexively when they see Garrett. When they see him clapping it annoys them even more. When they see or think about Garrett they think of other bad coaches and then they try to tie them together because they give the exact same feeling. I've seen Kubiak, Kotite, Jauron, Switzer, and a whole lot of Campo.

What you have posted that I can see sounds like more of people's reactions than anything Kubiak ever actually did.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
Seeing as how this stat is right in my Trading Value-at-Risk wheelhouse, kicking a 20 yarder with 0:03 time is around 99.5%. Assuming 252 business trading days, 95% would happen around 13 times per year. Conversely, the 20 yard FG is about a 4 sigma and may only happen 1 time a year.

In Football. 95% is 1 out of every 20 games vs statistaically insignificant probability.


95% sounds great, but no where near foolproof enough for most conclusions (FDA, etc, etc.)

That's cute, but we can't account for the magic air that you pulled the 99.5% out of. I can't find a win probability calculator that will give me win probability pre-kickoff.

Even if it is accurate, I don't expect a coach to be able to differentiate between the two in his head. 50% and 99%? Sure I expect you to be able to instinctively feel that one out. I don't have a problem with a coach basing 95% vs 99% on what he feels about the intangibles of the game.
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,117
Reaction score
20,555
Jerry is a risk taker. Big one at that. It probably was killing him watching us play ultra conservative and losing every time.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,278
Reaction score
13,866
What narrative fits directly? I'm supposed to go figure that out? Do you at least have a single coherent post that I can read that explains it. All I see you do is reflexively repeating that you have.

I have a counter narrative. There is a group of people that get mad reflexively when they see Garrett. When they see him clapping it annoys them even more. When they see or think about Garrett they think of other bad coaches and then they try to tie them together because they give the exact same feeling. I've seen Kubiak, Kotite, Jauron, Switzer, and a whole lot of Campo.

What you have posted that I can see sounds like more of people's reactions than anything Kubiak ever actually did.

Where are you getting your information? I've never once mentioned Garrett clapping. I've never mentioned his demeanor on the sideline or anything. I had this exact discussion with Idgit the other day and in a post earlier in this thread I went through ALL the similarities with this team under Garrett and the Texans under Kubiak. There is nothing reflexive about it. When people make judgements on coaches, players, whatever...they do it with comparisons or how the team, player or coach does vs what others have done. If there is a pattern the can discuss it. You can go find what I said about Kubiak in the thread. It's not too hard. There is no "feeling" to it. It's an experience and seeing how it worked out first hand. Like putting that plastic overlay paper over something. I saw the Kubiak era up close and personal living there and everything from how the front office treated him, to how he went 6-10, 8-8, 8-8 and 6-10, and in those years how he blew multiple games with time management and horrible playcalling, to how the one main argument for keeping him was "the players love playing for him."

You have zero argument here. You don't like the thread so your way of dealing with it is to ignore what Jerry said, ignore how the game was coached last night and try and make ridiculous statements based on some psycho-babble you are putting out there. If you can't go through a thread and read the posts then its pretty useless to just jump in and attack the messenger. It pretty comical though..thanks. I'm sure it makes you feel smarter, so thats good for you.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,547
Reaction score
27,837
Sean Payton rumor time?

I would trade a 4th for Payton. He would actually come in and run his offense and when we draft a QB I like his part in that. I could even see Marinelli staying under such a scenario. That would be best case scenario coaching wise for me. Make fundamental change but keep one of the core culture guys.

Keeping Garrett would not be the worst option. Having no options and hoping Jerry Jones is going to get it right is. I'd rather keep Garrett at that point.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,628
Reaction score
86,106
I would trade a 4th for Payton. He would actually come in and run his offense and when we draft a QB I like his part in that. I could even see Marinelli staying under such a scenario. That would be best case scenario coaching wise for me. Make fundamental change but keep one of the core culture guys.

Keeping Garrett would not be the worst option. Having no options and hoping Jerry Jones is going to get it right is. I'd rather keep Garrett at that point.

Did your account get hacked?

Im going to do the unthinkable and like a FuzzyLumpkins post.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,547
Reaction score
27,837
Where are you getting your information? I've never once mentioned Garrett clapping. I've never mentioned his demeanor on the sideline or anything. I had this exact discussion with Idgit the other day and in a post earlier in this thread I went through ALL the similarities with this team under Garrett and the Texans under Kubiak. There is nothing reflexive about it. When people make judgements on coaches, players, whatever...they do it with comparisons or how the team, player or coach does vs what others have done. If there is a pattern the can discuss it. You can go find what I said about Kubiak in the thread. It's not too hard. There is no "feeling" to it. It's an experience and seeing how it worked out first hand. Like putting that plastic overlay paper over something. I saw the Kubiak era up close and personal living there and everything from how the front office treated him, to how he went 6-10, 8-8, 8-8 and 6-10, and in those years how he blew multiple games with time management and horrible playcalling, to how the one main argument for keeping him was "the players love playing for him."

You have zero argument here. You don't like the thread so your way of dealing with it is to ignore what Jerry said, ignore how the game was coached last night and try and make ridiculous statements based on some psycho-babble you are putting out there. It pretty comical though..thanks.,

I just spoke of a narrative describing how things are around this place. I'm talking about common behaviors. If something doesn't apply to you then so be it. My intention here is not to single anyone out; I am no saint. Everything that I have described has gone on in the consolidated rage threads like this one.

This would be Garrett's first losing record. I notice a glaring omission of the 6-3 and 12-4 bookends to Garrett's actual finished seasons. From a totals standpoint Garrett has a winning record overall and this season is not over. If we win next week your narrative becomes ridiculous. You have anything else other than you feel the same way about Kubiak?
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Top