It cracks me up when the argument "He was the front runner in ATL, STL, and BAL ...." is thrown out there. He was an OC then, coming off a decent first season. Those teams were most likely turned down because papa Jerry had already promised his puppet boy he was getting the gig as soon as he could get enough reason to kick Wade out. You think any of those teams are upset they lost out on the greatness of Garrett? Not likely.
Now that Garrett has put together a rather mediocre resume I doubt you would see ANY team knocking his door down with offers to come to their organization. Not even Detroit or Cleveland would take that chance.
One playoff win in 8 years, misses the playoffs 75% of the
The only place that would hire Garrett to be their head coach if Jerry's neurons started to work again and kicked his arse out the door is Div 3 Western Omaha.
You know I'm right
One of those very rare occasions Garrett took blame instead of throwing someone else under the bus.
We’ve had a top10 offense most years with Garrett.He also had Tony Sporano still on staff from the Parcels era game planning for him in 2007. So, while Garret got all the credit for the 2007 offense, we can now look back on that success and ask how much of that was really due to him..
When has the offense struggled the most for a prolonged period? When Romo wasn't around.We’ve had a top10 offense most years with Garrett.
If your going to give credit to others when it’s had more success then you can’t blame him when it’s struggled.
Even with Romo, we went nowhere.When has the offense struggled the most for a prolonged period? When Romo wasn't around.
Previous players have said it was mostly Romo running the offense. It's time for Garrett to go. And, unlike Jerry stepping down, that may happen in the near future. Better to focus on that.
...He (garret) said, "Let me tell you this though, as a staff, we made a bad mistake. We should've got some help sooner, we should've tried some things sooner. That's on us."
Not sure I understand your 'case in point' comment, but that's fine. I *do* remember this quote. It's not the same thing the other poster was referencing, though, which is why I asked.
We’ve had a top10 offense most years with Garrett.
If your going to give credit to others when it’s had more success then you can’t blame him when it’s struggled.
Every time somebody says something bad about Garret, you want a link. You seem to be his biggest defender on the board.
I didn’t think Romo was enough to overcome them either. And why I’m concerned if Dak isn’t as good as Romo.
You have the quote where Garrett said he didn't think of giving Green help? I didn't see that quote. From what I recall, they shifted the protection over about a quarter of the time, ran at the gap, tried rolling protection away, and started calling quick-release passes and it just didn't work. The next week they did give help almost every pass, but then that didn't work either.
I'm not giving the coaches a pass for the ATL game, because they didn't have any answers for a mediocre player, but the idea that they weren't trying to counter the guy getting 8 sacks isn't true at all.
It's not true that I don't buy into Garrett ever doing anything wrong. I criticize him for the things that I think are important, like for blowing the #4 and #34 picks in 2016, and for failing to put together an 8 person OL that can actually play in 2017. What I don't do is attribute every shortcoming the team has on him whether it makes any sense or not. Which is why I don't care if an offense is predictable as long as it scores points at a high rate and why I don't ding the guy for not running the football enough when we run it more than everybody or for red zone scoring when we're consistently among the best in the league at red zone scoring.
personally I sure wish he would have taken one of those jobsThat's not all together true. Garrett turned down at least 2 head coaching jobs that we know of waiting to be the Cowboys head coach.
.
Why do we have a coach like Garrett? And why does Jerry insist on retaining Garrett?