In 2004 Colombo started 2 games and gave up 7 sacks. He hasn't played since then...No thanks.... I wouldn't take any of those players cut, I'll hold out for much better.Dayton_Cowboy said:I'm still curious to know how Columbo is doing health wise before looking at another backup OT. If he's healthy, I think he's a huge upgrade over anyone on the roster at tackle(other than Flo) and also Fabini... From most accounts of Columbo it wasn't talent that was the problem it was health issues
Rush 2112 said:Are you kidding me?
Rookie 6th round RT, Flo goes down, and a 3 time failure at RT gets moved to LT.
Very confusing.
I understand.
superpunk said:It's a decent enough bet, since he does have that track record. But, that's just speculating. Fact is, the difference in production of our offense pre and post Flozell injury is staggering. Was the drop solely because of Flozell's injury? Probably not. But, being able to look at that singular event, and the numbers surrounding it, certainly suggests that it had at least a substantial impact on the team's production, Bledsoe included. The Chiefs and Steelers had similar situations when their LTs went down this year, and their offenses suffered mightily for those games. Difference is, they got them back.
MichaelWinicki said:Then if Adams WAS THAT IMPORTANT why didn't we have better depth behind him?
I always post with emotion Mr. Lifeson. I think that and my username are why people always think I'm pissed off.Rush 2112 said:No emotion in that post.
How bout a little logic?
How many times have the Cowboys had 2 WR's catch 60+balls?
How many times has that happened with a 60+ catch TE to boot?
How many times has a QB thrown for the yards and TD's Bledsoe did?
With that OL and running game....are you joking.
Richie wasn't a smash mouth FB.
That answers that question.
Who cares who likes who.
Are they good football players is all that matters.
It's not a geritol attraction.
What's the attraction to rolling out young scrubs, guys of lesser talent, or guys before they're ready?
A quick answer is the salary cap.MichaelWinicki said:Then if Adams WAS THAT IMPORTANT why didn't we have better depth behind him?
MichaelWinicki said:Granted Adams loss hurt this offense... but you think back to the playoffs this year.
What team outside of Chicago had a worse starting QB than we did?
MichaelWinicki said:Granted Adams loss hurt this offense... but you think back to the playoffs this year.
What team outside of Chicago had a worse starting QB than we did?
superpunk said:I just don't get where the hatred for Bill's former players, coupled with the myth that he won't play young players, comes from?
MichaelWinicki said:Granted Adams loss hurt this offense... but you think back to the playoffs this year.
What team outside of Chicago had a worse starting QB than we did?
neosapien23 said:I hope Dallas goes OT in the first. If Pettitt can beat out McNeil or Justice, we would still need another tackle when Flozell retires. He only has a few more years left.
abersonc said:Just because it is a stupid thing to do with the #18 pick overall? Just because you can usually get guys that are just as good in the 2nd or 3rd? Just because you could get an actual impact player there instead?
Unless D'Brick is there then none of the guys are worth our pick.
BrAinPaiNt said:You mean guys like eddie george, marco rivera, Henry and Peerless Price?
The thing about older vs younger.
IF you can find a younger guy with good upside, chances are you are going to pay for him.
Then you have the argument I see many others use, why don't we cultivate the players we have...we do have young guys at OT right now.
So I would like the idea of getting an older vet who will play at a cheap price and would be willing to sit on the bench as a backup while the young guys get their chances.
I really do not have a hangup about the situation myself. If a player can help the team I am all for bringing them in no matter the ties to bill or no ties to bill.
As I said before my hope is that either the young OTs we already have on the roster step up, or we get someone worthy in the draft.
But after last years situation I would not mind a vet with EXP waiting in the wings if he comes cheap...and I am not going to be down on him just because he had played with bill before.
After all of that I said, I don't think we will bring him in, his injury and performance because of injuries over the last couple of years have not been up to par and I think bill learned his lesson with injury problems with the last guy he brought in.
MichaelWinicki said:I was good looking before I got old.
Next.
BigDFan5 said:
My self portrait. From last week.