- Messages
- 101,915
- Reaction score
- 112,917
I saw it, it was OK, but completely unrealistic on how I would imagine a draft day to go down, but that is Hollywood.
That's why I didn't see it in the theater.
I saw it, it was OK, but completely unrealistic on how I would imagine a draft day to go down, but that is Hollywood.
OK, There went my good nights sleep.So Jerry made this decision alone?
OK, There went my good nights sleep.
He's earned his roster spot by competing the past 3 weeks in practice. He has undeniable talent (he was coming along very strongly) at a position where we need an upgrade as opposed to Okoye who's health status is still iffy and has 2 players clearly better than him ahead of him in Crawford and Melton.
Btw, if you can't see the talent, Okoye certainly can. Mickey told a story on talking cowboys about 6 weeks back of interviewing Okoye at his locker room and he was talking about all the reinforcements we had coming back. Then to paraphrase he said 'for example this guy who's next to me'. Mickey thought he might be referring to Lawrence and then looked at the locker and realized it was Brent's. And he said to him, you think this guy can play? Okoye then said 'whoa, have you seen this guy move?'
That's the thing about Brent, people are failing to project is talent to this 4-3. He was an emerging NT in a 3-4 but as well as being the strongest guy on the team, he had quickness that's somewhere in btw Melton and Hayden. We can use that guy in the middle of our defense for a stretch run.
I don't even know where to start... Content, grammar, analysis, jeez...
Relax man, Jerry hasn't guaranteed anything. If the past 11 weeks haven't taught you anything about how this team is now structured, I don't know what will.
[SIZE=+0]This Josh Brent deal doesn’t pass the smell test. I’m concerned it could cause a locker room diversion. First let me say, I’m all for giving someone a second or even a third chance. True Josh paid his debt to society and I wish him well. With that said: why would Jerry come out earlier this year, and state that when Josh’s eligible he has a spot on the 56 man roster. That’s just doesn’t add up to me. Josh was coming along but he wasn’t that great that he’s “guaranteed” a roster spot. Does Jerry feel responsible and therefore obligated to Josh? More important, is Marinneli ok with this? If he’s not and this is more of Jerry’s BS, I guarantee you he wont be back next year. I.(eg Parcells TO). If Josh came in and actually earned a roster soft by competing in training camp, I would be all in. I hope I’m completely off base and Josh comes in a helps the team, but from where I sit something stinks in D.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+0]This Josh Brent deal doesn’t pass the smell test. I’m concerned it could cause a locker room diversion. First let me say, I’m all for giving someone a second or even a third chance. True Josh paid his debt to society and I wish him well. With that said: why would Jerry come out earlier this year, and state that when Josh’s eligible he has a spot on the 56 man roster. That’s just doesn’t add up to me. Josh was coming along but he wasn’t that great that he’s “guaranteed” a roster spot. Does Jerry feel responsible and therefore obligated to Josh? More important, is Marinneli ok with this? If he’s not and this is more of Jerry’s BS, I guarantee you he wont be back next year. I.(eg Parcells TO). If Josh came in and actually earned a roster soft by competing in training camp, I would be all in. I hope I’m completely off base and Josh comes in a helps the team, but from where I sit something stinks in D.[/SIZE]
Jerry Jones is a general manager. Josh Brent is a defensive linemen. The defensive line requires a defensive lineman with Brent's skills. Jones re-acquiring Brent fulfills some or all of the requirement demanded by the defensive line need. Could you clarify what is meant by "reasons other than football?" Are you inferring Jones reserved a roster spot for Brent out of a sense of charity? That would be atypical of Jones. Certainly, Jones has obtained questionable talent through the years but he has done so believing the players could be productive towards winning. So, I can see an opinion questioning whether Brent qualifies as a defensive asset for the team. However, I think the assumption that Jones re-acquired Brent for reasons other than helping the team win is farfetched.It obivous to me for reasons other than football Jerry made this decision in the spring. Another coaching de
Jerry Jones is a general manager. Josh Brent is a defensive linemen. The defensive line requires a defensive lineman with Brent's skills. Jones re-acquiring Brent fulfills some or all of the requirement demanded by the defensive line need. Could you clarify what is meant by "reasons other than football?" Are you inferring Jones reserved a roster spot for Brent out of a sense of charity? That would be atypical of Jones. Certainly, Jones has obtained questionable talent through the years but he has done so believing the players could be productive towards winning. So, I can see an opinion questioning whether Brent qualifies as a defensive asset for the team. However, I think the assumption that Jones re-acquired Brent for reasons other than helping the team win is farfetched.
I will not argue Jones' decision to re-acquire Brent excluded an emotional component. It very well could have. Jones is human after all. Narcissistic, but still empathetic. However, Jones feeling empathy for Brent and Jerry Brown's family does not define his decision as exclusively emotional. The motivation would certainly be separate from a football-only decision if Jones added him to the roster believing Brent would never become physically and mentally able to compete in the league again.there have been more than a few stories over the years where jerruh lets his heart over rule his head (even when sober)
Brown's mother apparently really got to him; and just about made him promise to give Brent a chance. So to be brutally honest when you hear the guy is still over weight and is not likely to play at all for several more weeks, the evidence that this is NOT a football decision is pretty damning.
[SIZE=+0]This Josh Brent deal doesn’t pass the smell test. I’m concerned it could cause a locker room diversion. First let me say, I’m all for giving someone a second or even a third chance. True Josh paid his debt to society and I wish him well. With that said: why would Jerry come out earlier this year, and state that when Josh’s eligible he has a spot on the 56 man roster. That’s just doesn’t add up to me. Josh was coming along but he wasn’t that great that he’s “guaranteed” a roster spot. Does Jerry feel responsible and therefore obligated to Josh? More important, is Marinneli ok with this? If he’s not and this is more of Jerry’s BS, I guarantee you he wont be back next year. I.(eg Parcells TO). If Josh came in and actually earned a roster soft by competing in training camp, I would be all in. I hope I’m completely off base and Josh comes in a helps the team, but from where I sit something stinks in D.[/SIZE]
I just talked to all those spaces between the lines. You seem to be their private joke.
Free speech and free thought includes the right to ridicule. You may wish to defend the practice of civility than constitutional privilege. Just an FYI.Do not hate free speech and free thought. If you disagree, state yo disagreements instead of ridicool.
Free speech and free thought includes the right to ridicule. You may wish to defend the practice of civility than constitutional privilege. Just an FYI.
What are you gonna do about it if he's not better?
But to promise him a spot on the "53" man roster is ridiculous.
High falutin words that say: Rudeness be accepted.
lol. Who said anything about acceptability?
People react differently when questioning expressed opinion. Whether right or wrong, I have been certainly been guilty of being a pain in the anus when it comes to questioning the logic behind comments. That means I have been uncivil at times (and will be in the future as well) but it does not excise my constitutional right of free speech. Free thinking does not exist inside teflon bubbles. Everyone (me included) must adhere to the forum's rules or face the wrath ofKHANNNNN!the moderators. Of course, obeying the rules does not prevent colorful criticism.