tyke1doe
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 54,310
- Reaction score
- 32,715
speedkilz88;2141770 said:I'm not sure about laws of the decision, but its a little different when talking about trademark laws than civil rights laws.
Agreed.
speedkilz88;2141770 said:I'm not sure about laws of the decision, but its a little different when talking about trademark laws than civil rights laws.
Hostile;2141801 said:I will repeat a challenge I have made to several Commanders fans. If you don't think the name is offensive, please come to Arizona to visit me and I will take you out to one of the reservations. Please walk up to a group of our native Americans and say "hello Commanders" just as friendly as you can. I will watch.
None of them have ever taken me up on my offer. Wonder why if it isn't offensive as they claim.
The Panch;2141790 said:Probably cause there arent enough Natives to defend themselves.
joseephuss;2141800 said:Sure there are major differences. The only similarity is time. I just think the argument of them waiting too long is absurd.
http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=121541fortdick;2141835 said:My wife was telling me a story about a city councilman that was talking about a project that was up for funding. He said the project would be a black hole for tax money. His fellow councilman, an African-American, took offense, claiming it was a racist remark.
How sensitive we gotta be?
To compare something that would take a major reach to be looked at as subliminally offensive to a blatant racial remark is amazingly ignorant.fortdick;2141835 said:My wife was telling me a story about a city councilman that was talking about a project that was up for funding. He said the project would be a black hole for tax money. His fellow councilman, an African-American, took offense, claiming it was a racist remark.
How sensitive we gotta be?
Good post.nyc;2141865 said:I think it's irrelevant how long they've waited. John a three year old native American isn't old enough to know that it is insulting to his heritage. By claiming "they" waited to long is stripping John of his rights because of someone elses non-action before he was born.
The judge is wrong.
speedkilz88;2141770 said:I'm not sure about laws of the decision, but its a little different when talking about trademark laws than civil rights laws.
"No one can make you feel inferior without your consent." --Eleanor RooseveltWrangler87;2141911 said:I'm about 20% American Indian, give or take a few percentage points. I hate the Commanders, but I'm not offended by their name one bit. It's a name. It's a word. For goodness sake. If you are confident in who and what you are, than something like this will never offend you. It's all about self esteem.
CaptainAmerica;2141775 said:Would have to read the decision to know the legal basis for the ruling, but there is a principle in the law known as laches which is defined as "an equitable defense accusing an opposing party of having "sat on its rights"; as a result of this delay, the delaying party is undeserving of equitable relief. It is a form of estoppel for delay."
It does sound like the judge was looking for a reason to side with the Skins.
That being said I've wondered for a long time how the Skins, in this day and age, are able to use that name and logo when our society has gone overboard on sensitivity and political correctness.
IMO Laches and Statutes of Limitations are ridiculous defenses. If you accept that this if offensive, then you have a continuing offense against Native Americans, and a whole new class of members as time goes by and generations pass. Does someone who was just born lose their rights just because their parents and/or grandparents didn't do anything?CrazyCowboy;2141948 said:guess the statue of limitations run out -- right?
Hostile;2141719 said:Judge says American Indians waited too long to sue Commanders
Associated Press
Updated: July 11, 2008, 3:24 PM ET
WASHINGTON -- A federal judge has sided with the Washington Commanders in a lawsuit brought by American Indians who consider the team's name racially offensive.
A group of Native Americans has been trying to get the courts to cancel the Commanders' trademark so that the team could no longer market its name.
But a U.S. district judge in Washington says the plaintiffs waited too long to bring their case to court. She added that her ruling does not decide "the appropriateness of Native American imagery for team names."
Copyright 2008 by The Associated Press
Hostile;2141801 said:I will repeat a challenge I have made to several Commanders fans. If you don't think the name is offensive, please come to Arizona to visit me and I will take you out to one of the reservations. Please walk up to a group of our native Americans and say "hello Commanders" just as friendly as you can. I will watch.
None of them have ever taken me up on my offer. Wonder why if it isn't offensive as they claim.
Hostile;2141928 said:"No one can make you feel inferior without your consent." --Eleanor Roosevelt
I still think it is an obvious slur.