Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
The Panch;2141790 said:Probably cause there arent enough Natives to defend themselves.
:laugh1: wth?
The Panch;2141790 said:Probably cause there arent enough Natives to defend themselves.
Skinsmaniac;2142314 said:I'm not saying they should or shouldn't be offended by it. Some are and some aren't. But there's nothing wrong with offending someone if you aren't trying to hurt them.
Hostile;2141801 said:I will repeat a challenge I have made to several Commanders fans. If you don't think the name is offensive, please come to Arizona to visit me and I will take you out to one of the reservations. Please walk up to a group of our native Americans and say "hello Commanders" just as friendly as you can. I will watch.
None of them have ever taken me up on my offer. Wonder why if it isn't offensive as they claim.
Skinsmaniac;2142288 said:The New Zealand rugby team is the "all blacks" but I doubt anyone finds that offensive because it's obvious it's not meant as a derogatory term and doesn't refer to skin color at all. Context is everything.
Yeah I was comparing the two terms. Because both are offensive to some people. The point I was trying to make is that the word "offensive" doesn't have any moral significance in the absence of the intent of the speaker.cowheel;2142317 said:You're comparing the term African American to the term "Commander"?
lol...you serious.
Nah.. Native American is comparable to African American.
"Commander" is more comparable to the term "colored".
And I don't care what the "intent" is... if some team names themselves the Louisiana Colored Boys... we got a problem.
Skinsmaniac;2142273 said:If you are in the supermarket and you hear the word "Commanders," what is your first thought?
Skinsmaniac;2142326 said:Yeah I was comparing the two terms. Because both are offensive to some people. The point I was trying to make is that the word "offensive" doesn't have any moral significance in the absence of the intent of the speaker.
Is the word black offensive if you use it? My guess is it wouldn't be. How do you define when it is wrong to use the word and when it's ok?cowheel;2142325 said:Uhhh... i'm not offended by that because New Zealand, from my knowledge, is not stained with 400 years of slavery, oppression, and racism against blacks.
cowheel;2142329 said:LOL...Thats not true at all.
We can argue about this all night- but you'll never get it because you just can't relate.
Skinsmaniac;2142330 said:Is the word black offensive if you use it? My guess is it wouldn't be. How do you define when it is wrong to use the word and when it's ok?
bbgun;2142358 said:This is all about "skin." Kansas City doesn't get in trouble for using the word "chief" or appropriating an arrowhead as its official logo. Elsewhere, Florida State has received the blessings of a real live Seminole tribe. The trick is to use benign terms that reflect or honor Indian culture.
Hyperion;2142340 said:It's the nickname of a sports team which in the grand scheme of things isn't that important. Maybe Washington should change the logo. The people, who want the Commanders to have their nickname forcibly removed, need to waste their time on something else.
Repealing the nickname of a sports team will do nothing to improve the conditions of Native Americans or change past atrocities. It's a huge waste of time and a diversion from actual real-world problems.
And for the record, I'm a Titans fan and have no bias for or against Washington.
mr.jameswoods;2142384 said:It does matter regardless if it's a nickname of a sports team. Changing a knickname might seem like a petty task but it's symbolic and it's society's way of acknowledging that using a racial slur as a team name is wrong.
People made fun of political correctness but for many minorities, political correctness has been a great thing and has taught society to be more respectful and to acknowledge that stereotyping is wrong.
I don't want my children or grandchildren growing up in a world in which its acceptable for a professional sports team to have an ethnic slur as it's title.
I was angry when I saw soccer fans in Europe hold up **** flags and yell racist obscenities at players and fans of the other team. However, how can I be mad at them when our country uses a racial slur as a team. Are we really better than them? The United States has always done its best to stand for something better and to create an image of equality yet we advocate something as disgusting as referring to a sports team as Commander. We should be ashamed. This is not characteristic of this country. This is the best country in the world and this kind of nonsense is not American
mr.jameswoods;2142384 said:It does matter regardless if it's a nickname of a sports team. Changing a knickname might seem like a petty task but it's symbolic and it's society's way of acknowledging that using a racial slur as a team name is wrong.
People made fun of political correctness but for many minorities, political correctness has been a great thing and has taught society to be more respectful and to acknowledge that stereotyping is wrong.
I don't want my children or grandchildren growing up in a world in which its acceptable for a professional sports team to have an ethnic slur as it's title.
I was angry when I saw soccer fans in Europe hold up **** flags and yell racist obscenities at players and fans of the other team. However, how can I be mad at them when our country uses a racial slur as a team. Are we really better than them? The United States has always done its best to stand for something better and to create an image of equality yet we advocate something as disgusting as referring to a sports team as Commander. We should be ashamed. This is not characteristic of this country. This is the best country in the world and this kind of nonsense is not American
Danny White;2141730 said:That's an absurd line of logic she used.
The fact that words can change meaning over time and that a word that was once "acceptable" can later become "offensive" is the whole point here.
There are plenty of words that fall out of favor and become more offensive over time. We could all list dozens of them.
I'm possibly the most conservative and least politcally-correct person on this board. But I can't, for the life of me, see how the Redsk*n name is allowed in this day and age.
It's a complete and total embarrasment.