It was well documented once the Cowboys gave Romo permission to seek a trade.......there were no takers/offers. Lots of initial speculations but it came down to only Texans and Broncos but neither team were willing to give up a draft pick OR guarantee him a starting job. John Elway admitted the Broncos would bring him to compete for the starting QB job but only after his release from the Cowboys.
No crap it's a passing league, it doesn't change the fact that defenses have clearly been neutered since then. Passing has gotten easier. You can easily verify this from just looking at league wide stats from 2006 to 2014 when Romo was starting and then compare to how the game has changed since then.
They weren't willing to trade because of the asking price by Jerry - THAT is well documented. An owner bugling the trade doesn't change the fact that they were wanting to trade for Romo, but Jerry is a bozo. Imagine that. To suggest that no team would have given up a draft pick, even late round draft pick, to take a chance on Romo is ridiculous.
It's not me ......... I'll be happy to read the proof you otherwise have.....
Rival fans dislike rival QB. Real big brain takes in here.
The argument was that NO team would trade for him - the problem was Jerry's asking price, that is specifically mentioned within talks with Texans.
Really dude? Don’t lack facts get in the way of truth.
Not really.......when it was all said and done, he was officially released, free to sign with any team but still left the game. IF the Broncos, Texans or any other team wanted him bad enough or vice versa, he was a free agent, why didn't he sign?
Not by Cowboy fans.....by Romo fans. Most Cowboy fans know what Romo was. I'm not entirely sure why post career he's been raised up to this level as if he's Brady or Rodgers.
Didn't the Cowboys release Romo? Why couldn't anyone sign him after they released him? Why do you think that is?
That's some ********. Romo has NEVER been a top 3 quarterback. Yeah I'm not gonna debate with you now you're out of of line. I'm not debating with a Romo fan its pointless.
Who cares if he is or not?
Kirk Cousins has played 11 seasons for the Commanders and Vikings. He has thrown for 37,140 yards and 252 touchdowns.
Tony Romo played 13 seasons for the Cowboys. He threw for 34,183 yards and 248 touchdowns.
Tony Romo had a 2-4 record in the playoffs in his career.
Kirk Cousins is 1-4 in the playoffs in his career.
Kirk Cousins has a passer rating of 93.7 with 1,047 yards, 5 touchdowns and 1 interception in 5 games in the playoffs in his career.
Tony Romo had a passer rating of 93.0 with 1,316 yards, 8 touchdowns and 2 interceptions in 6 games in the playoffs in his career.
Is Kirk Cousins the new.......Tony Romo?
Injuries and age and a hot shot young quarterback...
Yeah Romo and Dak are on the same level. Top 10 quarterbacks for their era and just could not get over the hump in big playoff games. Dak has a chance to prove himself though barring an injury.
I think he'd aim higher honestly. He'd rather be Aaron Rodgers or Aikman lol.
I agree. And Romo was a good QB. I'm not insinuating he wasn't. But he's far closer to Dak than he was Brees or Rodgers. They're of the same caliber.
A guy who led the entire NFL his last 6 years as a starter in 4th quarter game-winning drives is not a choke artist….regardless of what lazy or low IQ fans may say
Several factors
He was runner up the year Rodgers won MVP in 2014. How the hell was he NEVER top 3?
