Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 79,135
- Reaction score
- 104,207
Players even ones already in the league don't think to that level of detail. If they did, you would probably not see player Pro Bowl voting the equivalent of a popularity contest.
They think of themselves and where they fit in.
Because he has no choice in that scenario. Big difference there.
But you we referring to the team effectively guaranteeing him a starting role. If they drafted him in round 1, they're effecting doing exactly that. Especially when you're talking about replacing an undrafted free agent on a one year contract. There's not a more tenuous position on the entire line.
Again, big difference between committing in the draft to getting a player to compete versus trying to recruit that player, which is essentially what this is. Collins has all the choice in the matter and it would be a hard sell to tell him he would get the job. If drafted, his money probably gives him a leg up. Not the case here at all. Totally different.
For you, maybe. If what it takes is a guarantee of starting over Leary or Free, I'm totally fine with that. As I said, he'd have the same guarantee if he was drafted where his actual talent dictated.
It is very clear you are being hopeful as you have already admitted. But he is going to be making a business decision what is best for his future and your selling points are going to fall short because other teams can roll out a red carpet in comparison.
I don't see where or how anyone has said that. Nobody has provided a thoughtful, detailed counter proposal to the multiple examples I have provided.
The best I've seen is 'playing with his college buddies'.