Twitter: Lamb's response to Jerry's "No Urgency" comments

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
81,272
Reaction score
74,494
A lot of ifs in that statement. During FA, there was little to no chance that Prescott was going to waive it.
To say he wouldn’t have waived it if Lamb had been traded like he should’ve been if they are rebuilt is also a if statement. Guys with no trade clauses have been traded before.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,399
Reaction score
38,225
Are you here to defend the team or the player? You don't sound like a DALLAS COWBOYS fan. You sound like a PLAYER fan.
Which can be one and the same . You don’t think Lamb deserves to be paid top receiver money.

Or is just greed for anyone wanting Market Value?

It’s not these players responsibility to manage the Cap. If our ownership believes we can’t afford or build a team with such then we move on.

But that’s not on Lamb. He will get paid somewhere just like Prescott. That’s just typical business in the NFL.

Perhaps some fans lose sight the NFL is a business first. It is what it is AC.

It comes down to what’s in the best interest of the Cowboys. Can we afford him or not ? If not we move on and hopefully can get something for him. If not then it’s a huge blunder by our ownership.

Personally I can’t imagine Jethro letting him walk in FA. But anything is possible . Bottomline is Lamb deserves to be paid Market Price.
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,148
Reaction score
18,301
Then why not get paid playing for a winner?

The assumption that Dak doesn’t care about winning a SB is bizarre.
What winning team that is a Super Bowl contender was going to trade for him?
 

ErikWilliamsHeadSlap

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,135
Reaction score
1,255
Ceedee is laughing because the deal is probably 96% done. He will get signed. Dak will get 65 mill. And Jerry will have stayed in the headlines again for 6 months without winning or doing anything.
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,148
Reaction score
18,301
To say he wouldn’t have waived it if Lamb had been traded like he should’ve been if they are rebuilt is also a if statement. Guys with no trade clauses have been traded before.
Lamb wasn't getting traded. It's a senseless argument.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,958
Reaction score
49,369
Which can be one and the same . You don’t think Lamb deserves to be paid top receiver money.

Or is just greed for anyone wanting Market Value?

It’s not these players responsibility to manage the Cap. If our ownership believes we can’t afford or build a team with such then we move on.

But that’s not on Lamb. He will get paid somewhere just like Prescott. That’s just typical business in the NFL.

Perhaps some fans lose sight the NFL is a business first. It is what it is AC.

It comes down to what’s in the best interest of the Cowboys. Can we afford him or not ? If not we move on and hopefully can get something for him. If not then it’s a huge blunder by our ownership.

Personally I can’t imagine Jethro letting him walk in FA. But anything is possible . Bottomline is Lamb deserves to be paid Market Price.
That's the problem. THERE IS NO CAP FOR A PLAYER'S EVER INCREASING "MARKET VALUE".

The ever increasing "Market Value" keeps surpassing the yearly salary cap. It is unsustainable.
 

Chasing6

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,727
Reaction score
5,413
To say he wouldn’t have waived it if Lamb had been traded like he should’ve been if they are rebuilt is also a if statement. Guys with no trade clauses have been traded before.
Have guys that did not want to be traded, been traded before? No they have not.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,123
Reaction score
15,524
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The wheels on the bus go round and round,
the wheels on the bus go round...Soon Dak's bus is gone. He needs the money first, that bus is expensive.
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,746
Reaction score
19,064
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
It will not change. This is not a SB team. Maybe a wildcard at best. No reason to cave in. For all we know, Jerry thinks with out CD, Dak's numbers will go down and he will be easier to sign.

Or he thinks Dak will take less, to get CD signed.
Right lol lol lol
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,958
Reaction score
49,369

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,399
Reaction score
38,225
That's the problem. THERE IS NO CAP FOR A PLAYER'S EVER INCREASING "MARKET VALUE".

The ever increasing "Market Value" keeps surpassing the yearly salary cap.
The owners ultimately have the last word . Can they afford or not. We wouldn’t be the first team to lose top receiver to FA.

Again this is the business of the NFL. Top players bolt all the time for receiving their Market Value .

And as long as someone is willing to pay it , it will continue .
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,958
Reaction score
49,369
The owners ultimately have the last word . Can they afford or not. We wouldn’t be the first team to lose top receiver to FA.

Again this is the business of the NFL. Top players bolt all the time for receiving their Market Value .

And as long as someone is willing to pay it , it will continue .
That's the problem. It's gotten out of control. We can all see it. Those "Market Value" salary cap percentage hits for certain positional players keeps getting higher and higher every year, higher than the team salary cap gets increased.
 
Top