jterrell
Penguinite
- Messages
- 33,941
- Reaction score
- 16,046
ROFL no it is a terrible sample of what you are saying.JT, I'm not missing any points here. I said, it depends on how hard Leonard pushes it but Anthony absolutely forced a trade. He foreced his way out of NY. He is a perfect example of what I am saying.
If San Antonio trades Leonard to another team, it's a one year rental but Leonard does not have to report, he can hold out and he can get fined by the league but nothing else is going to happen other then that. The guys who decided what would happen with the Lakers a CP3 will not decide what happens with Leonard because that guy is gone. Stern is who voided that deal with the Lakers he is gone but never the less, it wouldn't matter. The League did not want to see the Lakers roll at the the time that deal voided. The League wanted James and Miami to continue to be the marque franchise. Now, it's different. James has come to the Lakers so the league is no longer likely to come down hard on the Lakers or Leonard because they want to see that team become another Super Team. It is in there best interests to see that happen. I'm not missing any points here. I'm just saying that the situations have changed and I no longer believe that the league would take a hard stance on that. You know as well as I do that the NBA picks teams they want to see do well and they have for awhile. Do you not agree with that?
I don't see Philly or the Celtics going all in on Leonard to try and get him for one year. I mean, I guess they could but would you? The difference between George and Leonard, IMO, is that George didn't necessarily want to come to LA to be second fiddle to James, IMO. I think he wanted to be the man in LA. Leonard, he wants to come to LA, not because it's LA but because he wants to play with James. I feel like that's the big difference in that situation but again, this is all just my opinion. I've said that multiple time but I don't see JT. I don't see Philly making a can't walk away from deal to San Antonio for a single year.
Lakers would be much smarter, IMO, to wait till 2019 and sign him to a max deal then. They have plenty of cap next year and it gives them time to figure out what to do with Ball. Another year for Kuz and Ingram to develop and Randle will likely be gone. If the Spurs decide to be reasonable and as I said, the longer they wait, the less they get, then OK. If not, then OK.
Let San Antonio file whatever they want. That will not help them and what they will end up with is a Leonard who is walking through the regular season and getting nothing for him. How does that help anything? San Antonio, IMO, needs to understand that all of their leverage went out the window when James signed. Before that, the Lakers felt pressure to get Leonard Signed. Now, there is no reason to over pay for him. Next year, there a a ton of pretty good FAs so even if Leonard decided not to go to LA, the Lakers would still get another really good piece in FA IMO.
It is EXACTLY what I am saying.
A player can't control where they get traded to and they can't control their destination while under contract.
They can try to discuss a buy out, they can ask for a trade, they can even get permission for their Agent to work trades, but the team has to execute it.
Disgruntled Carmelo's value has fallen so much he can't opt out now.
It's literally not possible for him to get 18M a year on the open market.
If Kawhi is asking the Lakers to go get him and they don;t they ALSO risk alienating him.
And for what? A couple kids they aren't gonna start and a future first? Oy Vey....
Just watch the rest of the dominoes fall.
I already tried to tell the non-patently absurd Lakers fans that LBJ wasn't playing with a bunch of kids.
Lakers immediately sign McGee, Stephenson, Rondo. Are negotiating with ancient Matty Barnes.
These guys are playing with LeBron.
A Kawhi trade is likely coming. Or they just like wasting cap money signing guys to not play.