theogt;2091473 said:No, he was my 5th or 6th rated corner.
punit329;2091451 said:if he had been available at pick 22 or 25, would you have taken him over Felix Jones or Mike Jenkins?
McKelvin was average to below average in college.DaBoys4Life;2091478 said:I would have he was my number 2 corner behind Cason. Heck i would love to see who you put before him DRC ? or FlowerS? lets be realistic for a second. Maybe jenkins..... outside of Cason MCkelvin was the clear numba 2 CB.
I think Fisher admitted he would have taken Felix instead of Johnson.Yakuza Rich;2091483 said:I still believe that Dallas should've drafted Jenkins at #22 and then they could stay put at #28 and probably get Felix (it sounds like Tennessee had their minds made up on Chris Johnson) or get Chris Johnson. I would've taken Leodis over Mike Jenkins at #22, although I would wonder why he slipped.
YAKUZA
theogt;2091489 said:McKelvin was average to below average in college.
I'd have Cason, Jenkins, DRC, and Flowers over him.
I know it's hard to believe some would place an emphasis on how well a player actually plays football.Bob Sacamano;2091496 said:again w/ the college thing...
theogt;2091500 said:I know it's hard to believe some would place an emphasis on how well a player actually plays football.
I don't. I balance the two. McKelvin's physical attributes didn't balance out his poor college performance.Bob Sacamano;2091508 said:the problem is you place too much emphasis on college production when these players are very inexperienced and still growing
punit329;2091451 said:if he had been available at pick 22 or 25, would you have taken him over Felix Jones or Mike Jenkins?
Yakuza Rich;2091483 said:I still believe that Dallas should've drafted Jenkins at #22 and then they could stay put at #28 and probably get Felix (it sounds like Tennessee had their minds made up on Chris Johnson) or get Chris Johnson. I would've taken Leodis over Mike Jenkins at #22, although I would wonder why he slipped.
YAKUZA
theogt;2091489 said:McKelvin was average to below average in college.
I'd have Cason, Jenkins, DRC, and Flowers over him.
theogt;2091511 said:I don't. I balance the two. McKelvin's physical attributes didn't balance out his poor college performance.
You can be a track star, but if you sucked in college at football, most likely you'll suck in the NFL at football.Bob Sacamano;2091539 said:but the thing is, college performance means jack strap once you enter the pros, it's physical attributes, coaching and the player's intangibles