CowboysExchange
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,349
- Reaction score
- 557
Witten was as good a tight end as they come, overall, until the last few years, and what player will just "step aside"? They all have egos, if Witten wasn't up to the task Garrett could have replaced him or reduced his snaps any time, don't buy the "feelings" as the reason he was around so long. If Schultz was all that great even Jerry would have made him the starter.
Witten is a 11 time Pro Bowler, NOBODY gets that many Pro Bowls if they're not an excellent player
Witten hasnt scored against a .500 team in 6-7 years and thats with blanket coverage. He has won nothing and got shut down everytime at the playoff level.
Gronk got double and triple teamed and still produced.
Witten never was a nucleous of a winning formula. Just the other guys around him just like now. Lmao
He was a great te yes until you needed someone to make the winning play and why he played all the snaps he NEVER MADE ANY BRO.
HE COULD GET US TO THE END ZONE HE JUST COULDNT GET US IN THE END ZONE AND CLOSE MAY GET YOU PRO BOWLS BUT IT FOR SURE DIDNT WIN A PLAYOFF GAME FOR US FOR 15 YEARS.
AS AWESOME AS #82 WAS HE WAS STILL A LOSER IN THE RED ZONE AND ON 3RD AND LONG AND ON GAMECHANGING PLAYS and come Playoff Time
Substution would have made him better. Not the same monotonous seam route or checkdown completion for 3 yards on 3rd and 10. Lmao
Substution and Rotation for better Rbs and wrs is crucial when you need a gamechanging play. These tes are worthless at that.
Jay Novachek wasnt a stud with gawdy numbers but he could make those Gamechanging plays
Last edited: