Let's get this Jerry thing right out in the open

silverbear;1416106 said:
Actually, the "hateful" behavior is aimed at a handful of people who have proven by their trollish behavior that they DESERVE it...

I'm a Golden Rule kind of Bear, I treat others as they treat me, or in this case, as they treat the board in general... approach us with respect and civility, and you'll get respect and civility in return... but approach us with the intent of stirring the fecal matter, and I'll treat you like a troll...

But there are ways of doing that which stay within the rules-- I can say an opinion you (or somebody else) might express is idiotic, but I can't call you an idiot...



And that is, I believe, eminently fair... you'll never hear me whining about how "hateful" you are toward me... then again, I've always said that I wear the contempt of the likes of you as a badge of honor...



Actually, I was sarcastically mocking your feeble attempts at lobbing insults... if you found that intimidating, that's your problem, since I'm not a mod in here, and have no authority to issue you any of those infractions...



Somehow, I don't believe you, since I got two different infractions for insults FAR less incendiary than you calling skinsscalper "braindeadchild"... indeed, one of the two infractions I got was for calling one of you trolls an idiot, the other was for telling a rather off-color joke (though I modified the language to make it more acceptable for this board, it WAS still an off-color joke)...

I deserved the infraction for calling that poster an idiot, I said as much at the time (though infractions are given privately, so as not to embarrass the offender, I fessed up to my transgression publicly-- without naming the mod who did it)... and if I deserved an infraction for "idiot", then you certainly deserved one for "braindeadchild"... as did skinsscalper when he responded, calling you "dumb****"... he should have gotten an infraction for that, too...

And if neither one of you DID get an infraction for that juvenile insult fest, then the mods aren't doing their jobs properly... which I rather doubt, which is why I think you're fibbing to us when you say you didn't get an infraction for that particular insult...



It would take several hundred centuries for the likes of you to evolve up to my level... LOL...


I'm not lying, let me repeat myself, I have never been warned by a mod for anything I have said on this forum, believe what you like. But I have never called anyone an idiot either. So maybe your rep is before you, that is prolly why you get warned.

Your insults don't bother me, in fact you are a tidbit entertaining and I kinda enjoy arguing with you, so I certainly don't hate you, you may hate me and that's fine. I don't take much personally, especially what you say, and I think you know the point of this argument that I was making and whineing about what you call me and others is not it. ;)
 
bbgun;1416125 said:
You should charge me with theft. After all, I stole it from you. Cheers.

yea, we let you think that. here's your bottle now, it seems to be feeding time.
 
bbgun;1415941 said:
Don't waste your time. Bear's the board's #1 trouble-maker/trouble-seeker.

I call out those who are looking to cause trouble... those who come in here to talk football, seriously and respectfully, have little to fear from this ol' Bear...

Every post is the same: ad hominem attacks or lame folksy jokes.

IOW, every post is NOT the same-- some of them are ad hominem attacks, some of them are lame folksy jokes...

And of course, it's a comical bit of exaggeration to say that EVERY post falls into one of those two categories; I'm also pretty well known among the oldtimers in here for my free agent and draft analyses...

A tired act that is long past its expiration date.

How sad for you that I'm nowhere NEAR done...

Oh, and he's very hung up on intelligence. Specifically, his big brain over yours.

LOL... it ain't my fault if I write well, if I'm articulate and educated... indeed, rather than "lord it over" guys like you, I try to "dumb down" my writing, throwing in words like "ain't", "gonna" and "kinda"...

Nope, it seems you guys are threatened by said intelligence, and often make an issue of it... which prompts factual rebuttal, in the form of things like my GPA, IQ scores and SAT scores, all of which are tangible proof of that intelligence...

If you guys didn't try to disparage that intelligence, if YOU didn't bring it up all the time, I'd never say a word on the subject... I'm content to let my posts stand as a record of what intelligence I may or may not have...

And I'm content to be judged on my combative nature, since that nature is almost always aimed at folks who are borderline sociopaths...

Don't debate him; pity him.

I'm to be pitied, yet you're the one WHINING...

And what sweet music it is to these old ears... :lmao2:
 
5Stars;1415948 said:
Oh, oh...bbgun is going to get slammed for this post! SilverBear is going to chew him up and spit him out!

:laugh1:

Well, of course I'm gonna respond, but don't think for a second that hearing him rant about how evil I am causes me anything but great pleasure... honestly, it cracks me up that I have him so mind-messed...

I think when bb gets ready for bed at night, before he turns out the lights, he checks the closet and under the bed, to make sure the Big Bad Bear isn't lurking... I am his boogeyman... LOL...
 
STSINAZ;1415952 said:
#
Blogging The 'Boys : December 5, 2005 - December 11, 2005

Peerless Price is not happy ... coach Bill Parcells wasn't as excited about the signing as Jerry Jones. Parcells wouldn't play Price. He said publicly he didn't know ... I want to win. I didn't come here ...

You'er using a FAN BLOG as your "evidence"??

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

You're gonna have to do better than that, hoss...
 
silverbear;1416144 said:
You'er using a FAN BLOG as your "evidence"??

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

You're gonna have to do better than that, hoss...

I found that to be rather comical too. I'm sure C.L. is feverishly searching for links to support his statement. Someone call in the www search & rescue team...
 
BigDFan5;1415956 said:
So what you are saying is you made it up and can not provide one single link to a journalist saying all this? You are the one that said it was in the media now prove it and post some links instead of a blurb from a blog that you edited and didnt link

And of course, if he HAD heard all those comments from players saying that Jerry wanted them but Bill didn't, those comments would have been grist for a series of highly critical columns from that moron Galloway, and JJ-T, and the Little Ball of Hate... so he would have links to some journalists backing up his claims...

Simply put, Jerry was too afraid of tickin' off Parcells, and havin' him leave, to EVER "force" a player on the Tuna... there might have been some instances where Parcells had to be convinced, even conned, into going along, but you can bet he personally signed off on each and every move the Boys made...
 
Dodger12;1415970 said:
BigD, would providing a link to a journalist saying all this solve your problem?

The point is to back up your assertions, when you make them... if you can't do that, if you can't even provide an article supporting your position, then it's quite likely that your argument is specious...

You're quite right that some would look for reasons to dismiss any article he might present, looking for errors of fact that call into question the opinions expressed... but at least some evidence in support of the claim would have been provided, it will have been established that the poster did indeed see and hear what he said he saw and heard... no matter the validity, or invalidity, of the article, it will document the claims made...
 
silverbear;1416154 said:
The point is to back up your assertions, when you make them... if you can't do that, if you can't even provide an article supporting your position, then it's quite likely that your argument is specious...


Well, you reap what you sew...



I think....


:confused:
 
SuperCows5Xs;1415990 said:
Grief don't bother me, but 'Bear doesn't need to be warning me about stuff I say when he says thing that are worse,

Poor BAY-BEE... did I hurt your widdwe feewings??

it looks as if Silverbear has been reaping what he sews

I did, indeed I did... the thing is, I never pretended I DIDN'T deserve my "punishment"-- unlike you... I slung an insult, and got an infraction for it... I deserved it, and the infraction is long since expired, and no mods are holding any grudges...

I also learned from my error, and have been careful not to repeat said behavior...

and no mod has ever warned me, like I said it's just a futile mind game on his part.

Hey, go ahead and ignore my advice... sling all the insults you want... just don't come cryin' to me when you hear from the mods, 'cause I won't CARE...

BTW it's sew not sow.

Wrong again... this definition of "sow" comes from the Oxford dictionary:

• verb (past sowed /sod/; past part. sown sown /son/ or sowed) 1 plant (seed) by scattering it on or in the earth. 2 plant (an area) with seed. 3 spread or introduce (something unwelcome).

And this one comes from Merriam-Webster's:

Main Entry: 2sow
Pronunciation: 'sO
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): sowed; sown /'sOn /; or sowed; sow·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English sAwan; akin to Old High German sAwen to sow, Latin serere, Lithuanian seti
intransitive verb
1 : to plant seed for growth especially by scattering
2 : to set something in motion : begin an enterprise
transitive verb
1 a : to scatter (as seed) upon the earth for growth; broadly : PLANT 1a b : to strew with or as if with seed c : to introduce into a selected environment : IMPLANT
2 : to set in motion : FOMENT <sow suspicion>

Then, when you consider the definition of the word "reap" (relevant because the line you said was "reap what you sow"), you find that Merriam Webster's defines it thus:

1 a (1): to cut with a sickle, scythe, or reaping machine (2): to clear of a crop by reaping b: to gather by reaping : harvest

And Oxford's has a definition that nicely ties all this together... pay particular attention to the part in bold font:

&#8226; verb 1 cut or gather (a crop or harvest). 2 receive as a consequence of one&#8217;s own or others&#8217; actions.

So, "you reap what you sow" is just a colorful way of saying that what you plant is what you'll harvest... it's a farming metaphor... in plain English, it means that a man's actions have consequences, which is a belief I've often expressed in this and other message boards...

For example, YOU'RE reaping what you'r sowing; you express a lot of wildly unpopular opinions, and as a result are rather unpopular in here your own self... and for my part, I long ago accepted that my actions have consequences too, but I'm always cognizant of that fact, and am content with the reputation I have established for myself on these boards, as a consequence of my posting history...
 
silverbear;1416140 said:
I call out those who are looking to cause trouble...

Basically anyone who doesn't doesn't don the Jerry kneepads. Who made you the cop of this place anyway? I don't remember voting you into office. Are you self-appointed, like Jerry?

those who come in here to talk football, seriously and respectfully, have little to fear from this ol' Bear...

Gee, that's comforting to know. I'll try to stay on your good side.

IOW, every post is NOT the same-- some of them are ad hominem attacks, some of them are lame folksy jokes...

Hey, that's great champ. Now go whittle something on the front porch.

And of course, it's a comical bit of exaggeration to say that EVERY post falls into one of those two categories;

Fine. 99%.

I'm also pretty well known among the oldtimers in here for my free agent and draft analyses...

And Lord knows we'd be lost without it. Does the Davis signing mean you'll stop shoving Blaylock down our collective throats?

How sad for you that I'm nowhere NEAR done...

Not just me. The whole forum suffers. Try to think of the collateral victims.

LOL... it ain't my fault if I write well, if I'm articulate and educated... indeed, rather than "lord it over" guys like you, I try to "dumb down" my writing, throwing in words like "ain't", "gonna" and "kinda"...

Paying yourself a compliment. Classy. Surely there must be other outlets for your undeserved ego. Bingo, perhaps? Line dancing?

Nope, it seems you guys are threatened by said intelligence, and often make an issue of it... which prompts factual rebuttal, in the form of things like my GPA, IQ scores and SAT scores, all of which are tangible proof of that intelligence...

Hey, I'm playing the lottery later and I need some numbers. What were those SAT scores again?

If you guys didn't try to disparage that intelligence, if YOU didn't bring it up all the time, I'd never say a word on the subject... I'm content to let my posts stand as a record of what intelligence I may or may not have...

Yes, future generations will revel in the greatness that is Bear.

And I'm content to be judged on my combative nature, since that nature is almost always aimed at folks who are borderline sociopaths...

Ad hominem attack #7,942.

I'm to be pitied, yet you're the one WHINING...

And what sweet music it is to these old ears... :lmao2:

Folksy signoff #9,658.
 
fiveandcounting;1416036 said:
translation - unless you have complete disrespect for Jones you are a homer who does not know football but if you have sycophantic love for BP youre ok

Hey, you've learned how to speak fluent STS...

I have to wonder if this is a good thing... :D
 
Bleu Star;1416088 said:
I was going to address that last (sew/sow) remark but I thought I would let you do the honors. ;)

And if I'd read the whole thread before responding to that post, I would have saved myself the time of looking up the definitions for this board's newest Norm Crosby...
 
5Stars;1416101 said:
You reap what you sew. ???

:confused:


:laugh2: Oh well...

He probably thought that "sow" was nothing more than a female pig...

It's the curse of a limited vocabulary...
 
bbgun;1416125 said:
You should charge me with theft. After all, I stole it from you. Cheers.

If you wanna be the best, you've gotta beat the best...

Bring it, don't sing it...
 
SuperCows5Xs;1416133 said:
I'm not lying, let me repeat myself, I have never been warned by a mod for anything I have said on this forum, believe what you like. But I have never called anyone an idiot either.

What exactly is the difference between "idiot", and "braindeadchild"??

Your insults don't bother me, in fact you are a tidbit entertaining

You mean a TAD bit, Norm??

and I kinda enjoy arguing with you, so I certainly don't hate you, you may hate me and that's fine.

I can't imagine ever "hating" anybody who has never caused me any real harm... it would take a thoroughly sick individual to "hate" somebody with whom he argues online... candidly, in my cosmos you are entirely insignificant... I forget you even exist just as soon as I leave this forum...

I'll say I have absolutely no respect for you, and I'm sure that feeling is reciprocated... but that's FAR short of hating you...
 
bbgun;1416183 said:
Basically anyone who doesn't doesn't don the Jerry kneepads. Who made you the cop of this place anyway? I don't remember voting you into office. Are you self-appointed, like Jerry?

I see-- you have the right to express yourself fully on any subject you might choose, but I don't...

Zieg heil, y'all... :D

Not just me. The whole forum suffers. Try to think of the collateral victims.

You first... try to think of what your constant anti-Jerry rants do to the fans of Jerry in here...

The plain truth is, some of those "collateral victims" tell me I crack them up when I'm rippin' on you and those like you...

Surely there must be other outlets for your undeserved ego. Bingo, perhaps? Line dancing?

Naw, you're stuck with me...

Yes, future generations will revel in the greatness that is Bear.

As well they should... love me or hate me, one thing you have to admit is you've never run across anyone quite like me on any other message board...

Just be grateful that the mods in here ride herd on my baser impulses; you wouldn't have lasted a month on the Cowboys' newsgroup, back in the glory days of that board...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,870
Messages
13,836,336
Members
23,782
Latest member
Cowboyfan4ver
Back
Top