The Quest for Six
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 20,614
- Reaction score
- 20,866
glorydaysrback;2809419 said:wide receiver is the most overrated position in the nfl.
you're absolutely correct!!!
glorydaysrback;2809419 said:wide receiver is the most overrated position in the nfl.
glorydaysrback;2809752 said:I bet you don't know what you are talking about. Sig bet says Roy Will out produces Bmarsh in 2 of the following 3. Receptions, Tds, and Yards.
Idgit;2809956 said:Salary cap ramifications aside, you don't think Bowlen would take a call from Jerry Jones re: a WR swap straight-up if Jerry had any inclination to make it?
I'll go out on a limb, way out on a limb, and say that Myles Austin is a bigger impact player in two years than Brandon Marshall will be. And not necessarily because Myles Austin is going to be all that great a player.
Alexander;2810128 said:Bowlen is doing the same thing Jones did after the Irvin days. He's looking to clean up the team's image. Getting rid of Cutler was due in part to that. He had alcohol issues and don't think that didn't factor in. Of course, he'd take a look at Williams. It would be a case of looking to get the best deal he could, not necessarily because he thought Williams is more talented. I don't think there is a GM in this league that would pick Williams over Marshall if there were no factors like character clouding the issue.
It is irrelevant anyways. Jones chased Williams for years and there is no way he'd trade him. I also don't think he's interested in getting another high priced WR, nor one with character concerns. A lot of the moves he's done from releasing Owens to the draft were to make way for younger talent and also to control costs.
It is the same catch-22 you have with any "troubled" player.
What I find a little interesting is that it is widely assumed that Marshall is a "thug" and a lot of it is based on an Outside The Lines show that is built on dubious facts at best. It is not widely known that the girlfriend that Marshall supposedly battered is a gold-digger and that sworn testimony states that she said he never touched her.
jamesdojr;2810284 said:Would love Brandon Marshall here. T.O. separated the team. He created an us vs them atmosphere. I'm an HR Director and I know exactly what this does to a team / company / department / organization. It destroys it.
Yes, Brandon gets in trouble from time to time but that doesn't necesarily equate to destroying chemistry. Irvin got in trouble a lot but was one of the stronholds for maintaining team chemistry. there's a big difference between T.O. and Irvin.
NextGenBoys;2809354 said:Another poster made the best analogy I've heard about TO when they said he's like Allen Iverson.
Yeah, Iverson dropped 30 a game, but he also went 8-25 far too often and hurt his team in the process of getting his numbers.
TO may produce on the field, but the amount of times we forced the ball to him at the expense of not getting others involved hurt the team.
JVita17;2809338 said:Lets go Get Brandon Marshall!!!
I suppose you want back players like Tank, Pacman, Ellis, Henry, Roy31......JVita17;2809342 said:I'd love to get TO back also.
GoCowboysGo;2810347 said:Sorry! But BM has beat up his girl friend(s) a whole bunch of times! Including the girl he went to HS with, I mean he's known her a long time and still he beat the crap out of her on numerous occasions. Doesn't that mean anything to anyone? He's standing trial later this summer! I just don't get it. How can people still say they want this guy knowing he beats on women?
Not to pick on just the quoted person here, which I have never done until this post. Sorry, I'm just shocked people would want a player who beats on women.
Here's the link about his trial this August:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4238587
Galian Beast;2810728 said:if he becomes available, i say pick him up. He is a stud. And would be a cornerstone for our offense for years to come. I'm always up for having TWO good wide receivers. Hell even three.
Lets not ignore the fact that we're obviously going to see a fall in Romo's production this year. He might have fewer interceptions thrown, but he'll almost certainly have fewer tds, yards, ypa...
There is a reason why we went ahead and got t.o. in the first place. And look how our offense eventually responded when we got a qb who could get him the ball...
Our offense went from 25th in 2004, to 15th in 2005 with bledsoe/johnson, to 4th with romo/owens, to 2nd with romo/owens full year. You want to try your best to maintain that ability, not take a step backwards. Lets make it easier for the defense, by producing on offense.
He also up until this juncture left declining football teams coming off losing seasons with him on the roster.Galian Beast;2810773 said:name one quarterbacks who's production elevated after losing t.o.
Jeff Garcia? Donavan McNabb?
No...
Romo might spread it around more, but he couldn't get ANY receivers balls last year year. It was disgusting.
Galian Beast;2810773 said:name one quarterbacks who's production elevated after losing t.o.
Jeff Garcia? Donavan McNabb?
No...
Romo might spread it around more, but he couldn't get ANY receivers balls last year year. It was disgusting.
Galian Beast;2810773 said:Romo might spread it around more, but he couldn't get ANY receivers balls last year year. It was disgusting.
Galian Beast;2810773 said:name one quarterbacks who's production elevated after losing t.o.
Jeff Garcia? Donavan McNabb?
No...
Romo might spread it around more, but he couldn't get ANY receivers balls last year year. It was disgusting.
burmafrd;2809347 said:TO of 3 years ago could still get it done. Todays TO is fading.
Apollo Creed;2809479 said:Totally disagree.
Every Super Bowl winning QB has had a receiver he can rely on.
I don't know if Tony Romo has had one since Terry Glenn.