Let's try to think the way this front office operates (1st rd pick)

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,669
Reaction score
38,268
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
In the same way Tyler was a T drafted to play G, Mazi was a NT drafted to play 3T, no?
Not really. Maybe. Its complicated. Tyler was projected to kick inside, with the possibility of developing as an OT.

Mazi is more of a mystery. He lost alot of weight to get faster off the snap, but I dont think its been stated who's call that was. I dont believe the plan was for him to be a 3T. I think long term they want him at 1T but want to develop
 

MonsterD

Quota outta absentia
Messages
8,109
Reaction score
5,807
Generally speaking, the value to be found at 24 would interior OL or off ball LB.

One of the top two centers ought to be there, and if that’s the target, it may even allow for a trade down of a few spots.
LBers are trash in this draft. LOL I mean as a first round pick it would be a waste of one, seriously it is a weak group of small and injured LBers.
 

Carson

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,045
Reaction score
66,986
Generally speaking, the value to be found at 24 would interior OL or off ball LB.

One of the top two centers ought to be there, and if that’s the target, it may even allow for a trade down of a few spots.
I disagree on LB.

I don’t love the talent there in round 1. I believe we are better off waiting for a guy like Colsom, Wilson, Gray
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,095
Reaction score
22,963
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Dont sleep on WR. Other than Lamb they have a 30 year old speed player with one more year on his contract. Gallup is done. We dont even know if Tolbert is good enough to be a #3
you guys are stressing me out by making me change my thoughts on the first round pick!!!!!!!!!! uhhhhhh
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,095
Reaction score
22,963
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Generally speaking, the value to be found at 24 would interior OL or off ball LB.

One of the top two centers ought to be there, and if that’s the target, it may even allow for a trade down of a few spots….and to spend Biadasz money elsewhere.
did someone say trade down!???????????????????????????/
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,095
Reaction score
22,963
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
LBers are trash in this draft. LOL I mean as a first round pick it would be a waste of one, seriously it is a weak group of small and injured LBers.
then you're already looking at our first round pick we love injured project players
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,095
Reaction score
22,963
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I'm trying to think of a Jaylon Smith or Damone Clark type they would get in the 2nd, maybe overdrafted 2 rounds or so.
maybe one will chip his ear and need major ear surgery to fix something very small, and won't be ready for the season, slips to the 6th round, we get him and plug him in as our starter!!!!1
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,227
Reaction score
20,259
WR- Agreed, cut gallup, bump tolbert to 3rd and draft a guy
T- Move tyler to tackle like they planned and bump asim as the LG starter. Draft a later round guy to backup or sign a cheap vet.
C- This should be the 1st round target. Centers typically fall as they aren't the sexy pick, if this happens you take one.
DE- Regardless what they do with Parsons they need a DE somewhere in the draft. DLaw is in the final year and Williams only has 2 years left. Need more depth.
LB- Perfect time to draft a guy to compete with LVE in his last year.
CB- Always be drafting CB's. Injuries happen and wright is in the final year of his contract if he even makes the team.
DE is a very sneaky need, but they usually take time to develop.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,227
Reaction score
20,259
Tyron leaving opens up two possibilities. 1) Drafting an OT in the first. 2 ) Moving Tyler over to LT.

#2 opens up a possibility of an OG at #24.

WR is a good thing to put money on. At minimum it would be the #3 and get a significant amount of snaps

Agree on CB. No Gilmore means a strong possibility. They could also let Gilmore walk and sign a vet like Fulton who they liked in the draft

If Zimmer doesnt like Smith, he may bang the table for Sweat. He has a history of using big DT's. However that doesnt mean they would go in that direction. They could just tell him to make something of Smith. Id say Sweat is a possibility, but a remote one.

My early money would be on a WR or OC at 24. OT entering the fray if Tyron walks
A lot will depend upon the status of both Tyron/Gilmore, if both back, we can cross those positions off the list.

Wide Receiver does make a lot of sense, Cooks/Lamb are both fa's next season. Tolbert really hasn't materialized into a starter and Gallup probably is gone.

Center is the flashing light position if Biaz is gone, which is expected.

Taking a LB this high, would be a massive reach.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,101
Reaction score
29,241
did someone say trade down!???????????????????????????/
Well, I don’t at all like targeting position, but figuring on being able to grab a top center in the first allows for….

-Potential upgrade overall. Biadasz is serviceable but we all see the difference before and after Fred. A big time center will have an immediate impact.

-Teams only use one of them, so they will tend to slip. Would you rather have the 6th best tackle or the very top center? They could probably deal down and recoup the Lance pick that many are nuts over.

-Second deal money can be used elsewhere instead of keeping the meh of status quo at center.

Again, this is not “Biadasz hate,” it’s about what makes sense and could make the most impact. If Tyler was the top rated LG and Martin is a first ballot HOF, why was the interior run blocking so bad this year?

Let’s get a dominant center and start controlling the LOS and clock again with the run, and suddenly things open up elsewhere.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,227
Reaction score
20,259
Generally speaking, the value to be found at 24 would interior OL or off ball LB.

One of the top two centers ought to be there, and if that’s the target, it may even allow for a trade down of a few spots….and to spend Biadasz money elsewhere.
Taking a linebacker at 24 is a massive reach, think Dane's 1st LB was at 40 in his top 100.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,227
Reaction score
20,259
Well, I don’t at all like targeting position, but figuring on being able to grab a top center in the first allows for….

-Potential upgrade overall. Biadasz is serviceable but we all see the difference before and after Fred. A big time center will have an immediate impact.

-Teams only use one of them, so they will tend to slip. Would you rather have the 6th best tackle or the very top center? They could probably deal down and recoup the Lance pick that many are nuts over.

-Second deal money can be used elsewhere instead of keeping the meh of status quo at center.

Again, this is not “Biadasz hate,” it’s about what makes sense and could make the most impact. If Tyler was the top rated LG and Martin is a first ballot HOF, why was the interior run blocking so bad this year?

Let’s get a dominant center and start controlling the LOS and clock again with the run, and suddenly things open up elsewhere.
Just look at the final 4 and their Centers. You are right, once Travis got sick, our run game has never been the same.
 

InPhiltraitor

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
1,366
Would expect JPJ to be off the board, and there should still be quality OT’s in this class at 24, so I’d think by default the selection will be an OT.

But this isn’t my war room so who knows. These guys could be looking at Long Snapper for all we know.
 

MikeT22

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,484
Reaction score
4,491
wr is the sexy pick, I think there's so much depth, we can get one in the 2nd or 3rd
I agree there should be quality at that point. But where do we get C, LB, RB, OT, DL and CB with 3 picks prior to the bottom of round 5?
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,101
Reaction score
29,241
Just look at the final 4 and their Centers. You are right, once Travis got sick, our run game has never been the same.
I think there’s a good chance they go in that direction.

I know he is family (drafted by Dallas) but I don’t think they will want to pay big money for Biadasz.

Especially with Bass and Hoffman around as fallback options.
 

Gambit

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,638
Reaction score
2,604
Tolbert still remains more of a backup.
The 3rd WR on this team is more of a backup role. CD, Ferg, Cooks are primary targets. Tolbert and Brooks have shown they can handle WR 3. That being said, I'd not rule out a WR at 24 if one of top guys somehow fall.


-If Tyron Smith is back, they aren't drafting a 1st rd Tackle to sit, but if he doesn't return becomes top need
Agreed, I think he'll be back though. He wants to, played at a very high level last year.


C-strong possibility if they allow Biaz to leave via fa
Again agreed. In normal years, I think they either resign or replace in FA, this year has some outlier circumstances though, I personally see them targeting a C Rd 1.


DE-possible. A lot will depend on how Zimmer is going to use Parsons
Sneaky need, there are a few Id like Robinson and Borlus to name 2. Not sure they pull that trigger there though.
3DT-possible. It would depend upon how they feel about Osa
NT-not happening with this franchise in back to back years, but is a need
This draft stronger with 3T guys. By early 4th most 1T will be picked over. I'd be very ok with Sweat at 24.


LB-there isn't a linebacker worthy of a 1st rd selection.
CB-Strong possibility, Zimmer loves 1st rd corners, but will depend on if Gilmore resigns
I'd be surprised, but if Kool-aid is there, maybe they take a sip. DeSean projects at S in NFL and would probably fit well for Zimmer but don't see us spending our 1 on him.

History shows us when new DC comes in they get them help via FA, Id expect at least on LB and run stuffing 1T brought in. Grover Stewart anyone?

If JPJ is there he should be pick. Doubtful he will be though, but the run on OT may scare teams into it very drafting them.
 

MikeT22

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,484
Reaction score
4,491
DE is a very sneaky need, but they usually take time to develop.
Yep. DLaw is nearing the end. Armstrong is probably gone. Fowler may be gone but he’s not a starter. Sam Williams, 1 or 2sacks a year Gholston, Redshirted Fehoko?

Yeah we need DE and DT, on top of C, LB, RB and even OT.

We will be lucky if we adequately address two or three of these positions.
 
Top