- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
That is the attitude that absolves the decision makers of being accountable for the decisions they are making at the point where acquiring talent is most important, namely the draft. Recognizing a player isn't going to work and moving on is great, but whoever made the choice or did the legwork on the guy, then supported acquiring the player, should have their future input on player matters questioned. Of course, no one bats 1.000 but with most of the drafts we've had the system that's in place and the people running the system and supporting it are deserving of, at the very least, criticism. Otherwise we may as well only link to dallascowboys.com articles and repeat and support only the things the team tells us are true.
Obviously, if the players you keep bringing in aren't upgrades to what you've got already, there's a big problem and people need to be fired. Coaches, scouts, GMs, if that could ever happen in Dallas. But, as long as the process is making the roster stronger and not weaker, then I don't see how it's a bad thing. It's a matter of debate whether or not our roster is getting any better, I guess, but I'm convinced it is.