Looks like the Yankees won Lee

ajk23az

Through Pain Comes Clarity
Messages
7,953
Reaction score
422
According to Bob Nightengale of USA Today, the Rangers and Yankees aren't expecting a decision from Cliff Lee for another few days.

Both teams have apparently issued a "menu of offers," with the Yanks' best proposal checking in at seven years and around $161 million. Rangers officials flew down to Lee's Arkansas home on Thursday and made their own pitch, but it's not yet known if they have topped the Yankees from a dollars and cents standpoint. Lee is likely to decide between the two this weekend. Dec. 10 - 12:03 pm et

Source: Bob Nightengale on Twitter
 

Stautner

New Member
Messages
10,691
Reaction score
1
ABQCOWBOY;3739733 said:
Well, they would almost have to go after him. I'd say that if they don't get Lee, it's about 100%. they are forced to give up prospects in exchange for Greinke.

They will be forced to do that if if they feel its essential to have one of the front line starters in baseball. They could always opt for stickign with their young, developing arms. I have to wonder if the Rangers feel they have a window of a couple of years to win it all and that's what they are gearing toward.

nyc;3739746 said:
My question is this. They made several offers and gave them all to him. What the hell does that mean?

Maybe they offered him 5, 6, and 7 year deals, but the value per year drops. $20M @ 7 year = $140, $22M @ 6 = $132M, $25M @ 5 years $125M. That seems the most logical, but it appears that did something more dramatic.

Maybe they could have offered him a 5 or 6 year deal, with a team AND player option. The 6th or 7th year could have buyout clauses of maybe $5M or $7M per year. A 5 year deal @ $25M with two option years at $7M buyout, that would make the deal worth a minimum of $134M for just five, but possibly could be worth far more if Lee went the full 7 years. If Lee felt he could make more money going back on the market, he could opt out and hit free agency after five or six years and resign at the going rate.

Hmm, that would be the type of deal I would throw at Cliff.

The problem with this deal is that Lee will be in another 5-7 years Lee will be 37-39 years old, and it would be a big gamble for him to bank on a top contract at that age.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Stautner;3739808 said:
They will be forced to do that if if they feel its essential to have one of the front line starters in baseball. They could always opt for stickign with their young, developing arms. I have to wonder if the Rangers feel they have a window of a couple of years to win it all and that's what they are gearing toward.



The problem with this deal is that Lee will be in another 5-7 years Lee will be 37-39 years old, and it would be a big gamble for him to bank on a top contract at that age.

Not a top contract, but if he is still pitching well he could land a big 2-3 year deal. heh in five years, the Yankees will probably pay him $50M a year. :laugh2:
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Stautner;3739808 said:
They will be forced to do that if if they feel its essential to have one of the front line starters in baseball. They could always opt for stickign with their young, developing arms. I have to wonder if the Rangers feel they have a window of a couple of years to win it all and that's what they are gearing toward.

That's true. They could do that. They are in a division where they might just be able to do that. I don't know the quality of their young arms. I know that they have some interesting position players that are coming up but I'm not all that familiar with their young arms.


The problem with this deal is that Lee will be in another 5-7 years Lee will be 37-39 years old, and it would be a big gamble for him to bank on a top contract at that age.

Both teams are taking this risk. I'm sure that each of them would rather offer more money per season with fewer seasons but that doesn't seem to be Lee's preference, which worries me. It would seem as if he would rather do that so that he could be in line for another Big contract in a few years. The fact that he doesn't is a bit troublesome.
 

tko112204

Active Member
Messages
601
Reaction score
46
What do you think gets Greinke if the Royals know Texas is desperate for him?

Perez (for sure)
Holland
Olt
and
??

It would have to be a haul.
 

WDN

Benched
Messages
426
Reaction score
0
tko112204;3739901 said:
What do you think gets Greinke if the Royals know Texas is desperate for him?

Perez (for sure)
Holland
Olt
and
??

It would have to be a haul.

I think you are looking at Perez, Profar, Beltre, and possible either Holland or Scheppers. They are asking for the moon right now.
 

tko112204

Active Member
Messages
601
Reaction score
46
WDN;3739937 said:
I think you are looking at Perez, Profar, Beltre, and possible either Holland or Scheppers. They are asking for the moon right now.


Scheppers is a bullpen only guy at this point. I mean, a very good bullpen guy, but they still don't yield that much on the trade market.

You're right about them asking for the moon though.

Perez, Profar, Beltre and Holland is maybe even short, just because Profar is so far away. Olt in his place gets it done, but I don't think I'd do that.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I wouldn't trade Holland. I think within two years, he is going to be a real stud. Left handed, power arm, and generally very accurate and extremely smart. The one thing he has been know for coming up through the minors is throwing strikes. He had a few control problems this year, but when he is on, he is dominate.

Top it off with the fact that he is 24, has about 200 innings experience in the majors and playoff experience, and he has a minimum of at least four more years before he can hit free agency. I think at some point he will be Texas ace. He is like CJ Wilson, but he has a naturally calm demeanor.

If you look, most of the best starting pitches in baseball have naturally calm demeanors. Cliff Lee, Roy Halladay, Felix Hernandez, Jered Weaver, Nolan Ryan, Greg Maddux, Andy Petettie, Mariano Riviera, etc. You can go on and on. Most of the time it's the excitable guys who end up with control problems. Holland isn't really like that.
 

tko112204

Active Member
Messages
601
Reaction score
46
nyc;3740006 said:
I wouldn't trade Holland. I think within two years, he is going to be a real stud. Left handed, power arm, and generally very accurate and extremely smart. The one thing he has been know for coming up through the minors is throwing strikes. He had a few control problems this year, but when he is on, he is dominate.

Top it off with the fact that he is 24, has about 200 innings experience in the majors and playoff experience, and he has a minimum of at least four more years before he can hit free agency. I think at some point he will be Texas ace. He is like CJ Wilson, but he has a naturally calm demeanor.

If you look, most of the best starting pitches in baseball have naturally calm demeanors. Cliff Lee, Roy Halladay, Felix Hernandez, Jered Weaver, Nolan Ryan, Greg Maddux, Andy Petettie, Mariano Riviera, etc. You can go on and on. Most of the time it's the excitable guys who end up with control problems. Holland isn't really like that.


Have to hope he doesn't have lingering effects from his WS meltdown.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
tko112204;3740028 said:
Have to hope he doesn't have lingering effects from his WS meltdown.

lol. That is an absolutely asinine statement!
 

tko112204

Active Member
Messages
601
Reaction score
46
nyc;3740517 said:
lol. That is an absolutely asinine statement!


I know, and I would hope that with all my other posts on baseball that you wouldn't really think I would believe that.

You're really easy, nyc.
 

bmzt31

Member
Messages
260
Reaction score
24
It makes me so happy wen the Yanks spend all this $ and they dont get into the playoffs
 

StylisticS

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,809
Reaction score
6,193

BlueBandit

Benched
Messages
508
Reaction score
0
Either way the Yanks win here - if they get him, great, he's awesome for 3-4 years and the rest of the contract , they can deal with -why? because they're the Yankees and the YES NET prints money - if they lose him to Texas , Texas is DONE, absolutely DONE - they won't be able to sign Hamilton and they won't be able to make ANY moves, Lee's annual $23M hit is a crushing to a franchise like Texas, that'll put them some $25.5 M over their normal budget payroll.
The YAnks alredy forced Boston to overpay for Carl Crawford by taking him to dinner. $142 M for CCrawford? wow.
 

Alumni2k11

Old Dominion University (Class of 2011)
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
1
A lot of money and years for a 32 year old pitcher that's had back problems. I can't imagine Cliff being close to effective as he is now by the end of the new contract. But I could be wrong. With that being said, I'm 50/50 if I want NY to sign him or not. I can't help to not be reminded of the Kevin Brown and Jason Schmidt contracts.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
JLAZeroSeven;3745452 said:
A lot of money and years for a 32 year old pitcher that's had back problems. I can't imagine Cliff being close to effective as he is now by the end of the new contract. But I could be wrong. With that being said, I'm 50/50 if I want NY to sign him or not. I can't help to not be reminded of the Kevin Brown and Jason Schmidt contracts.

The back problems were muscular in nature. That makes it very unlikely that it would be a reoccurring problem.

That said, I'm 50/50 on signing him too. Seven years $20M+ for someone who is on the wrong side of 30 makes me uncomfortable too.
 

Stautner

New Member
Messages
10,691
Reaction score
1
nyc;3745478 said:
The back problems were muscular in nature. That makes it very unlikely that it would be a reoccurring problem.

That said, I'm 50/50 on signing him too. Seven years $20M+ for someone who is on the wrong side of 30 makes me uncomfortable too.


I agree. I thought the Rangers would be competative on a per year basis, but I didn't think they would talk about a deal of that length.
 

Alumni2k11

Old Dominion University (Class of 2011)
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
1
Some rumblings on Twitter (Heyman and others) are saying a 3rd team made an offer, somewhere that Lee apparently loves. Wouldn't it be comical if after all the NY vs TEX bidding war talk, he ends up elsewhere?
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
JLAZeroSeven;3745838 said:
Some rumblings on Twitter (Heyman and others) are saying a 3rd team made an offer, somewhere that Lee apparently loves. Wouldn't it be comical if after all the NY vs TEX bidding war talk, he ends up elsewhere?

Sounds to me like his agent might be trying to drive up the price. Hard to tell.
 
Top