J-DOG;1991338 said:
I've noticed Goose is always more critical of the Cowboys more than any other team in football.
But that is the norm for the local media in Dallas.
For some odd reason bashing the Cowboys must sell papers or increase ratings in the radio market in Dallas/Ft. Worth.
After signing Flozell I would love for Gosselin to explain to me what the Cowboys could and should have done.
Fact is we have 2 first round picks. and increased our position in the late rounds with the trading of Ferguson.
I guess Gosselin thinks we should have held on to Julius and the great Jacques Reeves!
I don't pay attention anymore to them.
They try to go overboard sometimes with what they say as being against the Cowboys because I think they don't want anybody to claim they are homers for the club.
So they put out this anteceptic comment system on the team constantly so as to appear apart from that perception.
Randy Galloway does the same thing.
It's just the nature of the beast.
To get any respect from your fellow media buds, you have to appear investigative and above being perceived as being anything less than being totally objective and non-plus.
I've spent lot's of time in media tents and shot the breeze with reporters and believe me, they are not that interesting for the most part. They are extremely opinonated and agenda driven.
They are not this well-rounded fountain of information and or keepers of original thought for the most part.
They sit around a great deal and swap stories about their greatest news story or drop hints about some story that hasn't been published yet but will be soon..as soon as they get a collaborative source or somebody will pay enough for it.
Once they gather enough material from the press room or tent or from their meetings at the bar with their collegues, they run out and jump on their laptops to meet their deadlines and start the whole cycle again the next day.
They really just rehash alot of things and take reports from other writers and re-invent new what-if twists and include them in their column or blogs and refer to 'sources' as verification there is some validity to it.
Believe me..I know.
:starspin ReDBall ExPreSS:starspin