Proof
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,849
- Reaction score
- 14,411
umm "we were jumped on by the homers" lol. that's the victim stuff, and the sarcasm is all of your corny posts the last few weeks, not this one. and i didn't say anything about groupthink, i just pointed out that being intentionally provocative will typically get a reaction. it's not rocket science.“I have no issue with fans who wish to see the team through rose colored glasses and I have no problem with fans who only see the worst in our team …….just as long as they don’t dictate how everybody else should feel about the team. It’s really just that simple.”
this was my exact quote. What part about that implies that I’m a victim? Or sarcastic? Or surprised?
It merely states that I have infinite tolerance for a broad spectrum of viewpoints. it further states that forum members shouldn't be coerced into feeling a certain kind of way because someone doesn’t agree with it.
Nothing more….nothing less
If someone here wants groupthink and censorship perhaps they should be on the truth squad at Fakebook and Youtube……..there’s a little sarcasm for you. Very little.
if one guy says "y'all are happy with this win? nothing but field goals? keep drinking the kool-aid"
vs
"solid win against a tough defense. I am concerned with the red zone performance though, something to keep an eye on moving forward"
similar sentiment, but will probably get a different response. and there's just a lot of dis-ingenuousness on this board. not necessarily you, but you seem to like to play devils advocate for the more insufferable ones for some reason.