LittleD
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,824
- Reaction score
- 6,054
Good enough for 5,000 yds and 30 TDs, if Dak had Rodgers’s defense things would be lot different.
Stats are for losers. Championships and Super Bowls define great QB's.
Good enough for 5,000 yds and 30 TDs, if Dak had Rodgers’s defense things would be lot different.
Why can’t people simply think Dak isn’t the right guy without this kind of nonsensical exaggeration? Of course Dak isn’t as good as Rodgers, but a scrub? 306 passing yards and 27 points per game worth of scrub? The standard isn’t either elite like Rodgers or scrub, with nothing in between.
Those aren't intangibles, you can literally see and measure all of those things. They're basically all learned skills - literally the things that coaching is for!
I don't know what Dak's ceiling is but you l literally just named things that are all stuff coaches are supposed to teach players how to do.
Rodgers was absolutely appalling in all those things coming out of college and had to be reprogrammed, people only miss this because he didn't start for years.
Man I like the signing but Dak is still a scrub that will never win a an unfortunately. Dak dreams he can play a fifth of Rodgers
Why can’t people simply think Dak isn’t the right guy without this kind of nonsensical exaggeration? Of course Dak isn’t as good as Rodgers, but a scrub? 306 passing yards and 27 points per game worth of scrub? The standard isn’t either elite like Rodgers or scrub, with nothing in between.
You like the rest of us know that if the right scheme is married to the right player..Man I like the signing but Dak is still a scrub that will never win a an unfortunately. Dak dreams he can play a fifth of Rodgers
No doubt this will help Dak. However, he has too many intangibles to fix IMO. Inaccuracy, footwork, timing, throwing in stride, etc. basic QB fundamentals.
he doesn't have to be.Dak isn't remotely close to Rodgers and the team know it.
How on earth is Dak even in the league with all these flaws. Sheesh.No doubt this will help Dak. However, he has too many intangibles to fix IMO. Inaccuracy, footwork, timing, throwing in stride, etc. basic QB fundamentals. Despite the people around him underperforming from time to time, he had an all star cast. Zeke, a top 5 RB every year he’s been in the NFL. A 4 time pro-bowl WR in Cooper, who may not show up on the road, but is still a good WR. (Also, Cowboys Break made a good point about this. Besides D-Hop and Michael Thomas. Maybe Mike Evans or Julio Jones, what WR puts up 100 yard numbers every game? Not many. Amari is not the elite of the elite, buts he’s still good. Gallup was pretty good this year minus a few drops. Same as Cobb. O-line was great at pass blocking, yet Dak still fell off after the Pats game. Despite all that he had going for him, he failed to score on consecutive drives when we were down 31-3 against the Packers. Blame the Defense all you want, but Dak didn’t score when the Pack score 7-3, 14-3, 21-3, etc. Same as the Bears and Bills game. He failed to score a TD in the 2nd Philly game (he claims his injury didn’t bother him so I don’t want that excuse). Didn’t score one against the Pats. Or the Saints.
Bottom line: Dak isn’t our answer. He could make a great backup, and I’m sure he’s a nice dude, but we’re looking to pay for a franchise QB, not a nice dude with average football skills.
How on earth is Dak even in the league with all these flaws. Sheesh.
Most fans are morons...you don't need to keep posting to prove it...oh well keep posting...the Cleveland Browns keep playing football games...Man I like the signing but Dak is still a scrub that will never win a an unfortunately. Dak dreams he can play a fifth of Rodgers
Man I like the signing but Dak is still a scrub that will never win a an unfortunately. Dak dreams he can play a fifth of Rodgers
He's in the league because he's talented at football. Same can be said for the likes of Nathan Peterman. Does that mean he needs to be a starter and paid 35+ mil? No. It doesn't. Everyone who makes it to the NFL is talented, but I'm comparing Dak to other QB's and other players in the NFL, and compared to them, his talent is average/mediocre.
What other quarterbacks are you comparing him to? Because only one person had more yards than him and only 3 guys had more touchdowns than him and only 3 guys had a higher QBR than him.He's in the league because he's talented at football. Same can be said for the likes of Nathan Peterman. Does that mean he needs to be a starter and paid 35+ mil? No. It doesn't. Everyone who makes it to the NFL is talented, but I'm comparing Dak to other QB's and other players in the NFL, and compared to them, his talent is average/mediocre.
Right lol. That’s what I’m getting to. With all of those imaginary flaws he has.....he sure seems to do pretty good in comparison to the people around his age.Weird how he wins more, has better stats by nearly any metric, turns the ball over less, rushes more, etc etc than most of the qb's in the league. guess it's just dumb luck
Right lol. That’s what I’m getting to. With all of those imaginary flaws he has.....he sure seems to do pretty good in comparison to the people around his age.
Dak was rough coming out of college.Those are all tangible skills.
Why can’t people simply think Dak isn’t the right guy without this kind of nonsensical exaggeration?
Weird how he wins more, has better stats by nearly any metric, turns the ball over less, rushes more, etc etc than most of the qb's in the league. guess it's just dumb luck
Does that mean Eli with 2 rings, both against the GOAT no less, is better than Rodgers, Brees, Wilson, Young, Farve, Warner and Unitas, who all only have 1 ring?Stats are for losers. Championships and Super Bowls define great QB's.