McCarthy quote on Kellen Moore

Tiresome. The bet was about Garrett getting a HC job, not that "golly Stash was right about everything going back to 3rd grade".

And terms of the bet do not include what you put into the sig line. You didn't put any qualifiers in the bet regarding what could or couldn't be said before, you don't get to add them in now.

It clearly struck a nerve and that's exactly why you took it upon yourself to not honor the conditions and now try to change them.

Funny I don't remember putting any qualifiers on things when I lost that bet. But I guess that's the difference between honoring your word and not.

You will be wrong on the bet next year when Garrett does go back to a HC job, which is what I said in the first place.

Did you stomp your feet when you made this unfounded claim too? You come off as a petulant child once again, as you have all day. I'm not sure what kind of day you've been having outside of this place but you've managed to start an argument with everyone you've come in contact with here today. Hope you're proud of that.
 
Funny I don't remember putting any qualifiers on things when I lost that bet. But I guess that's the difference between honoring your word and not.

Because that bet was for avatar pictures and I said up ahead of time what it was (a picture of Garrett). There wasn't any of the nonsense you are trying today.
 
And terms of the bet do not include what you put into the sig line.

OK, so if I win the next bet I can ask you to change your Sig line to your credit card numbers, passwords and pin codes?

Good to know.
 
Because that bet was for avatar pictures and I said up ahead of time what it was (a picture of Garrett). There wasn't any of the nonsense you are trying today.

Another falsehood.

You actually created an entire thread about it and put it to a vote so it would be made to be an even bigger deal. After the fact. If you don't remember, I can easily pull up the thread again so you can look worse?

So if you're talking about nonsense" at least get that "nonsense" right.

True colors shining through.
 
By the way, you lost that sig bet. Garrett wasn't hired for a head coaching job. Time to pay up.
Garrett wasn’t going to get hired as a HC by anyone but Jerry and Trent Dufus Dilfer. Who thought Garrett was going to get another HCing job? That will never happen!
 
Garrett wasn’t going to get hired as a HC by anyone but Jerry and Trent Dufus Dilfer. Who thought Garrett was going to get another HCing job? That will never happen!

Apparently one certain someone. Who's throwing a Willie Wonka style tantrum today for some reason.

NKgK1VZ.gif
 
And terms of the bet do not include what you put into the sig line. You didn't put any qualifiers in the bet regarding what could or couldn't be said before, you don't get to add them in now.

It clearly struck a nerve and that's exactly why you took it upon yourself to not honor the conditions and now try to change them.

Funny I don't remember putting any qualifiers on things when I lost that bet. But I guess that's the difference between honoring your word and not.



Did you stomp your feet when you made this unfounded claim too? You come off as a petulant child once again, as you have all day. I'm not sure what kind of day you've been having outside of this place but you've managed to start an argument with everyone you've come in contact with here today. Hope you're proud of that.

This thread is totally kaiser in a nutshell.

He makes the preemptive claim that others are liars and then proceeds to lie out his rear.

:clap:

Kudos to you for calling him on it. I’ve grown tired of doing it.
 
And what does this have to do with you trying to change the phrase that I had you put in your sign line under the terms of losing the bet? Oh, that's right, NOTHING! There was no qualifiers on that, until you tried to include them today because you didn't like what you were required to say. That's where the "lie" occurred.

You've acted terrible today since you started this thread and you should be embarrassed by that.

And I would welcome feedback into who's right and wrong in this situation. If the majority feels that I am, I will gladly concede to your altered version of your sig line. If not, I'll expect you to honor that decision in the same way.

Let's hear it folks!
You win now and most likely again in 15 months, man and his word, need I say more.
 
I'm sure McCarthy really likes Kellen Moore.

But it is funny that we'll see McCarthy standing on the sideline next year not calling plays, when so many have been complaining about Jason clapping all this time and "doing nothing."
As you know, winning solves everything. So if it works no one will care who is calling plays.
 
Start trouble, get trouble. Just remember where the negativity started as well, while you try to pretend you're the positive guy.

these people were more Garrett apologists than Cowboy fans so now they’re but hurt because their homie is exposed

when even Jerry can admit Garrett is trash and you can’t, you’re beyond help
 
“Kellen was someone I was watching from afar,” McCarthy said, “regardless of what opportunity worked out for myself. The opportunity to work with Kellen was something I was going to pursue either way.”

Clearly Jerry started meddling with McCarthy years ago!
If Jerry wants someone MM will be the yes man and justify it.
 
“Kellen was someone I was watching from afar,” McCarthy said, “regardless of what opportunity worked out for myself. The opportunity to work with Kellen was something I was going to pursue either way.”

Clearly Jerry started meddling with McCarthy years ago!
Not really. He had 365 to study him. An experienced HC probably only needs an hour-and-a- half.
 
Here we go with another Pass Happy offense.
 
Tiresome. The bet was about Garrett getting a HC job, not that "golly Stash was right about everything going back to 3rd grade".

You will be wrong on the bet next year when Garrett does go back to a HC job, which is what I said in the first place.

You lost the bet. Just own up and put what he wants.

#DontpayDak
 
LOL, you have 7 of the 25 posts in this thread. If you are fanatical about attacking an opinion its really about you and not me.

And the Ignore function is for people who have better things to do than read haters and idiots. I waste a lot of time on this site but simpletons don't have a constitutional right to my time.

As an aside: I miss the ignore feature desperately. It’s not “for the weak minded.” It’s for ignoring the weak minded. Says so right in its name.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,041
Messages
14,508,688
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top