15 months is not long ago when there is no injury that robs the players of his talent. gregory did not play in the same timeframe and look at what he is doing.
u r saying irrelevant but u have no credibility.
in contrast to ur opinions, i am quoting the most credible person in the organization who effusively expounded on rico's displayed talent against 1st teamers.
the mcclay's comments/interview were supported by the video of rico going against 1st teamers making them look bad.
u just keep twisting the evidence to make ur argument. twisting facts in such a fashion shows that u r desperately trying to win an argument u r losing. such acts of desperation and fact distortion is symptomatic of someone who is irrational enough to desire what is bad for the team to win a stupid argument in a message board.
this is fantastic. I will use this exact line of reasoning that you have used. your own logic to prove you wrong.......
15 months ago is two training camps...so if this is his third, that means he had only one training camp...that's an assessment based on 1/3 of evidence...not the full evidence, which you have ignored repeatedly...conveniently. Further more the newer evidence is more relevant than older ones....for ALL NFL players....you have ignored that conveniently...
and u have no credibility....so what gives?
in contrast to a statement you provided, there has been plenty (10x) more evidence and quotes provided since that initial statement that says, clearly that he has not progressed. but you choose to ignore that.
and the 15 month old, two training camp ago comments have since been complemented with other videos, and evidence and comments that clearly state he is not ready...but you choose to be stuck in the past, not the present...that;s clearly evident
you keep twisting the old evidence, ignoring all newer, more relevant facts, comments, statements, videos and point to a singular comments from two training camps ago as the only necessary evidence to prove your point... given that I have seen you post some scientific BS you copied from some internet site, I assume you like to approach things scientifically and you have stated as much yourself...thus why ignore all the evidence and selectively choose only one, that's contrary to any scientific or logical approach, ignoring readily available facts...not opinions and the only logical reasoning is that you have an agenda.
furthermore I can say, that given your clearly proven lack of logic and reasoning and your obvious personal agenda (undisputable), that in fact its you who wants the bad for this team, since its evidently clear to all and I mean all, except you that Rico is not good for this team, thus putting him on the team, makes the team bad. you disguise that attempting to use one statement that's so old and so irrelevant, that in NFL is totally and absolutley irrelevant at this point and clearly given the chance ignore all other FACTS since...., and you do that for one reason and one reason only, your primary agenda of hating garrett. I think you very well know that rico sucks. your attempts in trying to use any level of logic has miserably failed over and over...and its obvious you hate to be wrong thinking that somehow that makes you a lesser person and not understanding that doing that in fact makes you lesser....and as well as rico presented hope to you and many others...but others have come to understand that he is not in fact anything of value..........but deeper inside hidden within your emotions, that you have mentioned on several occasions on this topic here and other threads.....is you would like to see this team do bad so that garret gets fired, which is not a sure thing, thus your desire to see the team fail.....if you confront that emotion and be honest with yourself...you would be in a better place
and given your penchant for argument, which since I am bored over the past few days, I have given you the time and attention which I regularly would ignore the clearly childish line of reasoning and given the total lack of logic, reason in your arguments, that in fact its you who has dug in and refuse to see the forrest because of the trees. Since the simple facts are evident to all on this board, in the journalist community, coaches, owners, etc. and you singularly trying to defend rico incorrectly, that this last statement is the truth that you fail to see.
until you deal with the underlying feelings and agenda of your argument you will continue to fail to see what is clear to all except you...in essence this entire 17, 18 page debate is you arguing with yourself and being on both sides of the argument
