SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,566
- Reaction score
- 13,989
It's always funny when people want to compare situations/TBs that are 30 years apart when the league has changed drastically over that time period.
It's just more rationalizing to try to convince oneself Zeke is still a great RB. He's not. He's not a threat. He's a guy that will pound between the tackles, will rip off few, if any bigger runs, isn't much of a big home run threat in the passing game, but is still a good blocker. That's it.
I need to see the justification for why Elliott needs 25 carries? What leads you to believe he'll become a real big time threat on carries 15-25? There is zero evidence to support that claim.
Bullsht.
There is PLENTY of evidence big RBs gain more yards as the game wears on. It's how a running game works. Sure...there are zip plays....of course.
You never heard of pound and grind? "soften up the defenses". Of course you have you are just pretending now to justify your zeke hate.
You don't get thos ebig running yards against a good defense until you beat them up some. It;s why #2s get more YPS.
THIS IS PURE FOOTBALL HISTORY PROVEN OVER TIME. I can't believe you are arguing it.
The problem with us is we abandon it after three run plays up the clogged middle and act like zeke is fat. Even Tony has trouble there.
Some teams choose a passing attack...and that is fine. NFC East has historically had poundings RB's. You wear them down and establish the run. It means you have to commit.
If we want Dak to be elite and have West Coast Passing numbers...then yes...zeke is a waste.
If we no longer have the the desire or ability to have a pounding ball control running game...fine zeke is a waste.
But to say Pollard can do it...is totally made up in your head.
I ask you again....plerase answer. What would Emmitt do with 9 carries. Or 12. NOTHING!