I'm not kidding myself. Gilliam was talented(never said otherwise), but it wouldn't have shut some people up about Vick. Plus Gilliam wasn't the same type of runner. Randall Cunningham ran just as well as Vick and Cunningham was a much better passer than Vick. That doesn't stop people from talking about Vick. Nothing Gilliam could have possibly done would stop the Vick promoters, either.
Yeah, I think it would have to a great extent. Vick is almost worshiped by some. Had Gilliam been able to succeed, he would have been the first Black QB in the NFL to start and have real success. He could throw but he could also run and run well.
I don't think I agree about Cunningham though. Randall and Vick, IMO, were the same guy. Physically they were different but, if you look at the numbers:
Randall was a 56.6% career passer. TD% was 4.8, INT% was 3.1. He averaged 186.2 YPG. QBRT was 81.5. Rushing APG was 30.6 with a 6.4 YPC. TYPG Avg. was 216.8.
Vick is a 56.2% career passer. TD% is 4.2, INT% is 2.8. He averages 167.9 YPG. QBRT is 80.9. Rushing APG is 45.8 with a 7.1 YPC. TYPG Avg is 213.7.
Now, Randall played a lot longer, to this point, and his rushing numbers did decline so that affects things. If Vick continues to play, the same will probably happen so it could change but as of now, really similar players statistically, IMO.