Techsass
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,517
- Reaction score
- 6,076
I think that was the point. Amber likes hanging out in left field.Absolutely zero comparison between Mina and Ambar. Mina studies and she's wicked smart.
I think that was the point. Amber likes hanging out in left field.Absolutely zero comparison between Mina and Ambar. Mina studies and she's wicked smart.
That depends on the poster, one extreme is as bad as the other.Actually it is the opposite. Dak is blamed for losses but never given credit for wins.
Shh. Just pretend she's an analyst.
Except you needed to correct me so badly.It wasn't my post. Not my tweet. If the truth wins, I feel better. thnx
Me too! I aim to do at least one or two stupid things daily. It often turns to five or ten. The key is to think about it.I do something stupid daily. But I try to learn from it.
No, it's finding the contributory factors to the loss, isolating and changing them. Hence the run defense and KM's inability to produce a scheme that can perform hurry-up offense in do/die scenario's have both been identified as the causes.Actually it is the opposite. Dak is blamed for losses but never given credit for wins.
Figures and data mean nothing if you cant extrapolate reasons......our Offense with a lead/behind Dak = extraordinary, chasing a game with time running out = catastrophe. Check the Jekyll and Hyde thread for Dak's rating differentials with 2 mins left (when winning vrs trailing).Dak had the best statistical game by any Dallas Cowboy QB EVER in the playoffs, in 2023.
He had 4 passing TDs, 0 INT and 1 rushing TD. He completed 75% of his passes for 305 yards.
Those are numbers Troy dreamt of.
He has been poor versus San Fran two years in a row. That is a fact.
But there are a lot more facts that bozos ignore and continue to parrot on this site.
Dorsett would be ashamed.
You are obsessed dude. Learn to have some fun.Figures and data mean nothing if you cant extrapolate reasons......our Offense with a lead/behind Dak = extraordinary, chasing a game with time running out = catastrophe. Check the Jekyll and Hyde thread for Dak's rating differentials with 2 mins left (when winning vrs trailing).
I'm responding to a post, not Mina. I'm surprised you haven't tried to blag some base (unscientific) stat out of itYou are obsessed dude. Learn to have some fun.
This is a Mina Kimes thread, and you're still chasing your tail after losing some previous Dak debate? Take a walk. Get a massage. Live a little. It'll really help you with thought processing.
Do want to further compliment you on that. Lived half my life thinking I had to be right all the time.Being wrong doesn't bother me
What about the "Crater the last game of the season every season" statistic???
When did this become a Romo thread?Shh. Just pretend she's an analyst.
ROFL my man you are talking loud and saying absolutely nothing.Figures and data mean nothing if you cant extrapolate reasons......our Offense with a lead/behind Dak = extraordinary, chasing a game with time running out = catastrophe. Check the Jekyll and Hyde thread for Dak's rating differentials with 2 mins left (when winning vrs trailing).
I was too busy trying to figure out your last thread.
Sound's like youre having a day on the smoke. Grading QB's is a waste of time and doesnt achieve anything. So what if Dak can perform (drive the bus, if you like) when he has a lead.....that's what he's good at. Coming back from behind is no longer one of his specialties.ROFL my man you are talking loud and saying absolutely nothing.
I don't need to grade a QB in rain with altitude against top 5 opponents to know what Dak is and isn't.
What he is, as Mina says here, is a top 10 QB.
What he isn't, as Mina also says, is a top 5 QB.
Further, if you complete dolts would listen to her, you'd know why both are true.