- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
The cespedes contract is new news. I'm not doing anything wrong.
Agreed.
But I can see this thing spiraling.
You've made your point. They've made theirs. Let's move on.
The cespedes contract is new news. I'm not doing anything wrong.
Agreed.
But I can see this thing spiraling.
You've made your point. They've made theirs. Let's move on.
Pitchers and catchers start reporting in 18 days.
I see where MLB is going to discuss (for the 2017 season) upping the strike zone from the bottom of the knee to the top of the knee.
I'm big on this happening.
Strikeout numbers are beyond ridiculous at this point and walks have decreased accordingly, which has also driven down runs scored.
It would also help put more balls in play.
Leave the strike zone alone. Knees to the letters. If they cant hit that then they dont need to be playing in hte majors. The would be better getting the UMPIRES strike zone consistent. I would even put a chip in the ball and a radar at the plate for across the plate and let the umps call it between the knees and letters. Beats the heck out of strikes the umps are missing right down the middle but calling Greg Maddox strikes 6 inches off the plate
Leave the strike zone alone. Knees to the letters. If they cant hit that then they dont need to be playing in hte majors. The would be better getting the UMPIRES strike zone consistent. I would even put a chip in the ball and a radar at the plate for across the plate and let the umps call it between the knees and letters. Beats the heck out of strikes the umps are missing right down the middle but calling Greg Maddox strikes 6 inches off the plate
Well in essence it would be knees to the letters, but it would be the upper part of the knee as opposed to the bottom of the knee... which is how it was prior to '96.
You think it will really make a significant difference in the games?
I'm not against strikeouts. But let the guys that truly are strikeout artists like say a Nolan Ryan, or JR Richard get them. But to see every Tom, Dick or Harry average a strikeout per inning is way over the top.
Oh yeah. guys that have been making a living on that low-strike, which is very difficult to drive with any authority, will become a harmless ball.
If will take away a few K's per game and it will generate a couple more walks per game... Not only will we see more base-runners, but with pitchers have to pitch-up more in the strike-zone you're going to see more contact all the way around.
I'm not against strikeouts. But let the guys that truly are strikeout artists like say a Nolan Ryan, or JR Richard get them. But to see every Tom, Dick or Harry average a strikeout per inning is way over the top.
I guess some of it will depend on how umps call those balls/strikes even with a change.
Yea, there's more appreciation for the true strikeout pitchers when they're the only ones that can really do it consistently. It does separate them.
It's become over-the-top. Just like when there were so many 40 & 50 homerun guys. It was ridiculous... Brady Anderson, 50 home-runs... really?
Of course.
But if the commissioner wants it to happen... it'll happen.
And the thing with baseball is, a slight change can have very noticeable results.
Obviously there are enough people associated with the management of baseball who dislike how the game is progressing that they are pushing for a change.
My perscriptuon to fix baseball:
1. shotclock on pitches
2. on a full count, three consecutive foul balls puts you out
3. 80 games, not 180 or whatver it is
4. ban the in and out of the batterbox to adjust gloves after every pitch, you step in once, youre in for the entire at bat