I will yell from the roof tops how inept and incompetent and horrendous McCarthy is with time management and it rears it's ugly head over and over and over. Sometimes it's blatant and inexcusable and sometimes it's more subtle. But I have no issue with last night. We wanted the ability to run or pass every single play. We needed a TD, not a FG and the TD and XP put us up 3, not 2 which is also big in determining how to manage the clock. When you need just a FG to win you run the clock down to nothing. We needed the ability to run it 3 times if we got to the 1 and we did get to the 1. We needed the ability to run it after the Luepke reception if we wanted or at least to make Pitt think we might and depending on how that play went would determine what we do after that play. Plus after that Luepke play, the odds shifted from them to us so I wanted us to be level headed and think about what we were going to do. The fumble made us pass the last two plays which is part of what left more time on the clock, but we needed time to run 3 QB sneaks if we had to (and we should have). We also wanted the offense to settle down and not feel like they were rushing or out of control because I don't like this offense's chances as much when we are rushing. We needed to get in the end zone and whether we left 1 or 30 seconds on the clock wasn't as important as it usually is. The second TO: you could say you knew you were throwing after the fumble so you should run clock, but that allows Pitt to not worry about the run so you don't want to do that either, so I am good with that TO also to re-group and decide what we wanted to do. Then the 3rd TO was because Tolbert was banged up and would have had to come out of the game and guess who stayed in because of the TO and caught the winning TD?
The poor time management was when Pittsburgh called that TO before the TD. If they had that they could have attempted a pass up the middle, called a TO and tried a long FG.