Didn't the judge ultimately agree with Brady in his case but rule that the CBA is ironclad in the league's favor?
If you read the judgment in the Brady case, the court states that there were no issues of fundamental fairness. The case itself was about the integrity of the game itself and had no precedent.
This case has plenty of issues with fundamental fairness. It is about a criminal complaint and it has tons of precedent.
Also the DV policy was not collectively bargained.
Just forget about the Brady case. It was never as all encompassing as people have been claiming.