Well to be fair I think the rankings are based on "fantasy points" which doesn't really have anything to do with anything. Still these numbers do help add some color to the picture..
Sure. I don't disagree with that. I'm just saying, Dak deserves some blame for his poor performance of late as well. When I look at those numbers, I see the top QB's in the league taking plenty of sacks, hits, hurries, some with less time than Dak.
I think Dak is a good QB. I just don't think he's "great", & certainly not worthy of being the highest paid Cowboys of all time, or the 3rd highest paid NFL player of all time. I'd be a LOT happier with Dak as our QB, if he was making 10 mil/yr less. That seems to me anyways, were his skill level would align with his contract better.
It has NEVER been easier to be an NFL QB, than it is right now. At least not in my lifetime (1970-present). You can't touch em, & defenses can't touch receivers, or light em up. Look at the punishment our greats took years ago..? I think Roger took more savage hits in one game, than Dak has in his career...lol. Same with his receivers. While the NFL is still violent, it's soft compared to previous generations, especially for those involved in the passing game.
Many of today's players would never have survived in the 70's or even the 80's. Ronnie Lott would've sent Cole Beasley to the morgue...lol. LT would've ended many of today's QB's careers. Not necessarily with injury, but would've exposed their mediocre play.
My point is simply, I'm not impressed with passing numbers, & stats. Offenses have it too easy today, compared to their predecessors. Great players could play in any era. Any doubt what Montana could've done in this era..? How about Aikman..? Yet, I don't think Dak could've been a long term starter in the 70's, or 80's.