Bizwah;2155443 said:
Very good movie. I enjoyed it very much. I was into it the whole time.
But I still like Batman Begins better.
I liked Bale (best Batman) and Eckhart. Both were great in their roles...as was Oldman. I thought they were a great team.
I was disappointed in the Joker. I was impressed with his plans...I just didn't find him amusing....at all. I did like him better than Nicholson's Joker (which I just thought was awful).
Maybe that's not what they, the producers, wanted. I guess the Joker in the comics is a sadistic madman. That was pulled off very well. He was murderous. He wasn't funny in a ha-ha sense. He was the "Joker" in the fact that he didn't see the world as everyone else...he thought the world was a joke.
But I prefer the Joker in Batman the Animated Series. Funny....hilarious...yet you know he's dangerous, unpredictable. Mark Hammil was brilliant.
I also found him simply disgusting to look at. Again, I guess that's part of what many like about him.
I know many loved how the Joker was portrayed. And that's fine...I guess you can't please everyone.
This is an observation of Heath Ledger's The Joker which I can fully understand, basically for two reasons:
1. Comics Code Authority from the 1950's into the 1970's strong-armed comics creators into transforming their characters, both heroes and villains alike, into fictional morons to prevent comics books from 'corrupting' the public. During the decade before that nonsense began, The Joker was a mass homicidal, sociopathic villian.
After the implementation of the comics code, The Joker was transformed into a lily-livered clown. Literally. Movies and television, especially the 1960's
Batman series, followed suit. It wasn't until the mid-70's that
DC began to come to their senses by slowly ignoring the foolish voluntary censorship of the CCA and revising the character back to its original, true roots.
By the 1980's, The Joker was back to being depicted as an totally insane, evil adversary of The Batman. Even so, that didn't influence Tim Burton well-enough to depict his vision of The Joker fully as he was intended. Instead, he allowed Jack Nicholson enough creativity to infuse the character with a murderous, yet comedic personality. Jack worked within the constraints of Burton's world and created an unforgettable role for the ages, but it was
not an accurate portrayal of the character.
2. No cartoon or anime version of The Joker that I've ever seen has fully shown his true colors. (Note: I haven't seen the latest Blu-Ray/DVD multi-feature that's currently released though). While the animated Joker shown in both the 90's and 21st century series are very entertaining (I love them too), they aren't accurate versions of the character, but that is to be expected. They are meant
primarily for Saturday morning viewing. There are moments of dedicated drama, but mostly it's intended for children (darn it).
Moviegoers watching
TDK are pre-conditioned to see The Joker as: a) he was originally created, b) as the clown he was transformed into, and c) both versions. I can't even been to describe how long I've personally agonized waiting for someone, anyone, to re-create the real character on the big screen, since I knew how false he has been portrayed for decades. I owe Christopher Nolan and Heath Ledger a debt which can never be repaid. He brought the real Joker to the movies. Untainted. Unbridled. Uncompromising. Ugly. The perfect antithesis of The Batman. Pure genius is an understatement.
Rest in peace, Heath Ledger. Rest in peace.