He was being sarcastic you pillock! Did you even bother reading what he wrote?CowboyWay;2149831 said:HTownCowboysfan is probably the biggest fan of these movies on this site. Look at his first post. "I guess it was ok" was his first reaction after seeing it.
CowboyWay;2149801 said:Good Lord guys. I can't believe you all loved this film. I just got back from seeing it with 5 other people, 2 of which were actually extras in the film.
We all thought it stunk, and we loved the first one, and love most of these superhero movies.
This thing was bad from start to finish. Ledgers acting was pretty good, I'll give him that, but the plot was poor, there were several holes in it, and some things that were just so ridiculously dumb, you just laughed at it.
If I hadn't of been with two guys were were extras in it, I probably would have walked out of it.
Ugghhhh. I can't believe how dissapointed this movie was. I can't wait for more of you to see it to hear if anyone else felt the same way.
This is the worst superhero movie I've seen since the Hulk about 5 years ago, which was godawful.
HTownCowboysFan;2149902 said:You are certainly entitled to that opinion. Film -- as is all art -- is subjective. But I think you are way WAY off base. The film is getting rave reviews by just about every major reviewer out there. It's "94% Fresh" at Rotten Tomotoes (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_dark_knight/) and it just set the record for 12:01 AM showing by taking in $18,000,000. So the statement, "I can't believe you all loved the film" is a tad off. We're in the majority and it appears that you are in a very small minority.
So obviously, I disagree totally. It's a masterpiece...a great film.
I think it's safe to say that this isn't true and that the overwhelming majority of movie reviewers (professional and otherwise) are in love with the film.CowboyWay;2149936 said:I think its safe to say that most people who have seen it so far are pretty hardcore fans of the series, I'll be interested to see what the casual fan thinks of it after they see it in a couple weeks.
Your opinion is in the extreme minority, which is most likely the result of a strong desire to be contrarian than anything related to the film. Hell, you can't even explain why you didn't like the film, other than a single character in the film and a "cute" plot.All I can tell you is the 6 of us were dissapointed, and we also heard several grumblings throughout the crowd as we exited the theater of people who said the same thing.
Oh well.
burmafrd;2149965 said:BUt it does amuse me how some are basically saying you are stupid if you do not love this movie.
Excellent observation and question.MC KAos;2149995 said:amazing movie, heath was awesome, and eckerd(sp?) was awesome too. i loved how realistic they looked. i mean, do you really think the joker, if real, would apply makeup perfectly like the jack nicholson joker? or how about tommy lee as two face? super lame! this movie was flipping AMAZING....
SPOILER ALERT!!!!
ok, here is my question though, do you guys think that two face died, or they just had harvey dent "die" so they can keep up the good image of him? i was very confused by that
theogt;2149813 said:My guess is the plot was a little complicated for him/her. It's a long movie, with multiple layers to the plot, so you actually have to follow along and not just drool on yourself.
CowboyWay;2149828 said:I thought Bale was great in the first batman. This one, not so much.
HTownCowboysFan;2150058 said:Y'all...how good was Heath?
Just in case you didn't read my comment earlier...HTownCowboysFan;2150058 said:Y'all...how good was Heath?
DallasEast;2149655 said:Oh shoot. One last thing. If every single major awards show (not just the Oscars) does not honor Heath Ledger with an appropriate award, The Joker should cut off their you-know-whats.