Crown Royal;2150421 said:
I was worried that my expectations were too high for this movie, such as they were for the Matrix sequels.
I don't think I'm overreacting when I say that Superman I has lost it's throne as the "super hero movie against which all others are measured." I will always love that movie, it defined much of my childhood imagination, but it now must gracefully and humbly retire.
Sometimes, I believe I'm the only guy who loved The Wachowski Brothers' sequels.
Superman was my no.1 superhero flick until
Batman premiered in '89. There was (and will always be) three things about
Superman which has kept it high on my all-time superhero film list:
- Marlon Brando
- Christopher Reeve
- John Williams' music score
Gene Hackman's role was Lex Luthor was way too campy for one of the best actors of the 20th century (imo). Too many, "Miss Tessmockers (sp?)!!!", were thrown in for my taste. Ned Beatty's inclusion was a complete waste of unnecessary comedic diversion. Margot Kidder never seemed to get Lois Lane 'just right' for me. I can't really say exactly how in words. However, even short elements like Glenn Ford as Jonathan Kent will always keep the movie special for me. It still pains me remembering Ford's fatal heart attack scene, even though I knew the Superman origin inside-out well before I saw the movie.
Spider-Man replaced
Batman as my standard until
Spider-Man II. Thank goodness, the first two were great because
Spider-Man III was an utter embarrassment.
Hollywood is blessed to have someone like Christopher Nolan raising the bar on how to make superhero adaptation movies. Comics have always been filled with a wide variety of unique characters and storylines just begging to be seen on the big screen, but without the idiotic campiness that many producers and directors felt would be accepted by the public. Nolan has effectively killed that nonsense. Now, will others accept that fact and make more superhero movies which will be equally worthy?
thekavorka;2150429 said:
As much as I love the movie, it's not perfect. I really have to nitpick for some of these:
1) Some of the editing/cuts seemed a little off. Like what happened to the Joker in Bruce's penthouse after Batman/Rachel fell out? I also would have liked to see how the Joker was able to take the cop hostage in the interrogation room. Just stuff like that. Basically, I wish the movie was even longer.
2) The dialog during the SWAT chase was terrible. "that's not good. that's really not good".
3) The cell phone sonar was a little out there. Although they introduced it in the Hong Kong scene, I thought the sonar was a little too crazy for Nolan's universe. Then again, we got to see badass Batman with the white eyes.
4) Although they replaced Katie Holmes with Maggie Gyllenhall, I didn't think she was any better or worse than Holmes. Just not as pretty.
1. I slightly agree on The Joker's exit scene from the penthouse, but disagree about the interrogation room scene. Batman had thrown The Joker against the one-way/see-through several times, causing glass shards to fall everywhere. You can see them in the scene immediately after the Detective Stephens was rolling up his sleeves while telling The Joker he was going to have to, 'find some enjoyment out of beating him'.
The camera cuts back to The Joker cracking his own neck and then smiling as Stephens approached him. The glass can be seen all around Ledger. He could have easily used the glass as a weapon to overpower Stephens since he wasn't handcuffed. Heck, The Joker could have overpowered Stephens without using the glass. Stephens was no Batman, to say the least.
2. Agree about the dialogue. I did enjoy the observation made by one of the officers that bullets wouldn't penetrate the police van. Then, the next scene had The Joker pulling out a bazooka. I totally expected that and thought that was appropriate (and funny) dialogue at that point.
3. If there had been more time for Batman to identify, locate and subdue Joker's men and free the hostages, I would agree about the sonar. He had only a handful of minutes though, so I have to disagree. Having a technological edge to help accomplish his goal in a short timespan was more realistic for me than to watch him somehow mysteriously find all those people exactly where they were stationed and dispatch them.
4. I agree about Gyllenhall. Is it just me or is she not aging well at all from film-to-film?
the kid 05;2150474 said:
i made sure to look if he was breath i didn't see any movements.
Knightley would also be good cuz she has the sass of ivy
I dont remember the Knight Fall, care to explain?
but i was thinking about the movie while at work last night. They had a funeral for Harvey and talked about him being a leader and what have you, thus signifing the death of the good man Harvey dent...but maybe like a phoenix (thank thats the right spelling) he rises again only more twisted and bent on revenge againts batman for not allowing him to get gordon.
I wouldn't want Dave "batista" as that would tie us to WWE movies...and yeah they suck, Dwayne "the rock" is free from wwe though and is a solid actor who is still learning
knight fall summary :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman:_Knightfall
Thanks for checking out Harvey.
I'm twisted on Dent's demise. His death makes for a great ending for
TDK. Then again, he's a great supervillain in The Batman's universe.
Glad to see you found a KnightFall summary. It's a great storyline.