Myth of no open receivers

Ever heard "throw the receiver open?"

You throw that ball pretty much right to the 50 on the field and there's not a defender anywhere near Beasley. That is WIDE OPEN and it doesn't matter if Bease is looking or not.

Did you watch the all22 video or are you just look in at the silly still gifs?

Every receiver can look wide open if you take a still shot of them at one paticular moment.
 
So do you want our Rookie qb to fail or do you actually get your jollies out of his struggles in this game?

Even Eagles fans aren't having this attitude towards Wentz and he hadn't been half as good as Dak this year
You missed the point. Nobody wants anyone to fail. But turning a blind eye to, or ignoring visual evidence is pretty funny. The Dak love fest train can roll on but not recognizing something that better be addressed before the playoffs start is the definition of stupidity. Team is rolling towards home field and a bye. Whoever is running the show better not screw it up. Romo won't get as pass either.
 
You missed the point. Nobody wants anyone to fail. But turning a blind eye to, or ignoring visual evidence is pretty funny. The Dak love fest train can roll on but not recognizing something that better be addressed before the playoffs start is the definition of stupidity. Team is rolling towards home field and a bye. Whoever is running the show better not screw it up. Romo won't get as pass either.
I don't need all 22 to tell me that if there is a corner underneath and a safety trailing in the middle of the field, you throw it over the corner to the outside of the WR. If Beasley doesn't read that dead spot in the zone and get there, but the ball does, it's on him.

Beasley being open there is so obvious I can't even believe that people are debating it.
 
You missed the point. Nobody wants anyone to fail. But turning a blind eye to, or ignoring visual evidence is pretty funny. The Dak love fest train can roll on but not recognizing something that better be addressed before the playoffs start is the definition of stupidity. Team is rolling towards home field and a bye. Whoever is running the show better not screw it up. Romo won't get as pass either.

He had two tough games against two top defences on the road, won one, lost the other by missed fg. He'll learn. He also won 11 straight, and they weren't all against Cleveland. Yes he struggled, but he's shown to have the ability to learn and grow. Romo has never been an automatic winner vs top Ds, let's not pretend were the Pat's. We're a good to great team, but not invincible. We will lose on occasion, possibly even the playoffs. It happens, only one team wins.
 
LOL. What took you so long? I thought you'd be the first one here basihng Dak.

Why? I've never bashed Dak. I leave the bashing to Romo haters.

I've been trying to be less confrontational, but there is only so much nonsense I can take. Your argument is absurd in this case and anyone who has watched football for any length of time knows this. You know this. Find your objectivity.
 
Smart post. Did you play QB or WR at some point?

Nope. I played offensive and defensive lines in high school but my body wouldn't let me play in college. I coached a few years in middle school and high school 20 years ago. I'm not claiming to be an expert but just stating my opinion based on watching the All-22.
 
Did you watch the all22 video or are you just look in at the silly still gifs?

Every receiver can look wide open if you take a still shot of them at one paticular moment.

You do know that gifs are not still shots, right?
 
Had the ball been thrown to Beasley at the time Dak threw the ball it would have either hit Beasley on the back or his side as Bease is turning at best.

So it would have hit Beasely in the back even though his head was turned back towards Dak while the ball was still in the air on the way to Dunbar? This, despite the fact that the ball would have to travel farther to reach Beasely?

This is what I mean by embarrassing yourself.
 
Had the ball been thrown to Beasley at the time Dak threw the ball it would have either hit Beasley on the back or his side as Bease is turning at best.
He's facing the QB before the ball gets to Dunbar. Wouldn't he be facing the ball by the time the ball got to him, 20+ yards further down the field?
 
Exactly. Dak has proven he is the future but anyone that thinks he is better than Romo right now is insane
I agree. what we should have done, is say we have our QB of the future. he was the back up and did his Job. Romo is better, has more experience, and put room in, knowing if things go bad, we pull the plug and put Dak back and romo is gone next year (regardless). there is a reason in 50 years of NFL, no rookie QB has ever won a superbowl. give enough film to DC and they will figure it out. I think they have figured Dak out. He came into the perfect situation, great Running game, good WRs and great OL. don't get me wrong. he is the futue. but he is not now. even prior to this game, he had been slipping and his games were far from good. he had had his moments at the end of some games (credit to him), but he had been average otherwise.
 
He's facing the QB before the ball gets to Dunbar. Wouldn't he be facing the ball by the time the ball got to him, 20+ yards further down the field?

First of all, you implying with yout still gifd that Bease was wide open yet Dak just completely missed him which is total BS. If you bothered to look at the endzone angle shot, Dak is looking a Bease all the way.

He didn't "miss" him. He is waiting to throw to him until a LB comes off of Witt and blitzes having a wide open shot at Dak. The LB is about 8 yards away to Dak's right side. Dak has about a second to make a decision before the LB is on him.

There is also a DL left of him close by pushing in. Dak did what he is coached to do and checked it down to Dunbar. Had he thrown it to Bease, at the time the LB is coming for him, the ball would have arrived too early. Only other choice he had was to slide to his left, but due to the DT, it would have been a difficult throw or a potential sack/batted ball.
 
So it would have hit Beasely in the back even though his head was turned back towards Dak while the ball was still in the air on the way to Dunbar? This, despite the fact that the ball would have to travel farther to reach Beasely?

This is what I mean by embarrassing yourself.

Just stop. Did you even watch the all22 clip? Base on your comments, I doubt it.
 
Why? I've never bashed Dak. I leave the bashing to Romo haters.

I've been trying to be less confrontational, but there is only so much nonsense I can take. Your argument is absurd in this case and anyone who has watched football for any length of time knows this. You know this. Find your objectivity.


If you are truely objective, you'd know that half of theogt's pics claiming WR are wide open and Dak missed all of them are just plain BS.

BTW, I'm a big Romo fan but it's just stupid to bash Dak just to prop up Romo. Especially using fabricated evidence.
 
First of all, you implying with yout still gifd that Bease was wide open yet Dak just completely missed him which is total BS. If you bothered to look at the endzone angle shot, Dak is looking a Bease all the way.

He didn't "miss" him. He is waiting to throw to him until a LB comes off of Witt and blitzes having a wide open shot at Dak. The LB is about 8 yards away to Dak's right side. Dak has about a second to make a decision before the LB is on him.

There is also a DL left of him close by pushing in. Dak did what he is coached to do and checked it down to Dunbar. Had he thrown it to Bease, at the time the LB is coming for him, the ball would have arrived too early. Only other choice he had was to slide to his left, but due to the DT, it would have been a difficult throw or a potential sack/batted ball.
Are you going to answer the question? Wouldn't Beasley be facing the ball by the time the ball got to him, 20+ yards further down the field?

And Dak wasn't worried about the very late blitzing linebacker who was 7+ yards away from him at the time of the throw. When the ball left his hand, there was no one within 3 yards of him. He could have thrown the pass to Beasley at the exact same time as he threw the pass to Dunbar.

qlgXRKZ.png
 
If you are truely objective, you'd know that half of theogt's pics claiming WR are wide open and Dak missed all of them are just plain BS.

BTW, I'm a big Romo fan but it's just stupid to bash Dak just to prop up Romo. Especially using fabricated evidence.

I never mentioned any of theo's other pictures. I only commented on the one play that you are so obviously wrong on. I didn't bash Dak, so why bring it up? You are making things up for the purpose of arguing and defending. You are not being objective.

From your other reply, you also apparently don't realize that gifs are not still images but rather a sequence of images that show movement. Almost like a mini video.

If Dak threw the ball to Bease at the exact same time he threw it to Dunbar, Beasely would have been turned and ready to catch the ball. The visual proof is overwhelming. Beasely is turned and facing Dak while the ball is still in the air to Dunbar. If it was headed towards Beasely instead, it would still be in the air at that point since he is much farther away and the ball would take longer to get there. I'm trying to be polite here, but you have to be in complete denial or lacking cognitive function not to realize this.
 
First of all, you implying with yout still gifd that Bease was wide open yet Dak just completely missed him which is total BS. If you bothered to look at the endzone angle shot, Dak is looking a Bease all the way.

He didn't "miss" him. He is waiting to throw to him until a LB comes off of Witt and blitzes having a wide open shot at Dak. The LB is about 8 yards away to Dak's right side. Dak has about a second to make a decision before the LB is on him.
Yes.

I want my qb to be able to make a decision with a linebacker baring down on him with the game on the line late in the 4th quarter.

I'm weird that way.
 
Back
Top