Myth of no open receivers

[Romotil45]

I know all about it. That's not the point of my post. So if you can't follow along. Don't bother making comments that's has nothing to do with my original point.

I'm not trying to be a donkey but LAST NIGHT your point WAS beasly wasn't looking back so Dak would not have thrown to him. That was your point last night and it's important that you understand that's incorrect reasoning for your future football knowledge growth as a fan.

 

[DavidS]

I love Dak. Couldn't be more happy we have him on the team. But the guy had one of the worst games I've ever seen. And he's been missing open receivers all year long. It's not just this game. He's a rookie. It's expected.

But I want a Super Bowl, not growing pains.

Couldn't have said it any better man. This is our time to win a Superbowl.

 

[noyatta21]

There were open receivers on virtually ever pass play. Some of them were painfully obvious. Some of them would have required tight windows. But this myth of no open receivers is nonsense. Honestly, I got tired of cutting and circling images.

These pictures don't mean anything with sub titles. The down and distance will determine coverages. Don't forget about pressure. The Giants played great defense. On occasion Dak held on to the ball but other then a few plays, our receivers couldn't separate from the Giants defenders. Also it I should going to take a 36 year old QB with back problems at lease 5 games to find his rhythm. Dak needs tough games like this to grow!!!! Actually he played better than ELI!!!

 

[Zman5]

I'm not trying to be a donkey but LAST NIGHT your point WAS beasly wasn't looking back so Dak would not have thrown to him. That was your point last night and it's important that you understand that's incorrect reasoning for your future football knowledge growth as a fan.

My original post was to point out the pic theogt posted was not what it appears to be. He posted a pic that showed how the field looked at the end of the play. In that pic Bease looks as wide open as Twill was on the TD play. In the pic, he is alone looking back at Dak. But if you go and watch the video, Bease is nowhere close to being as open as the pic that was posted. He hasn't even turned around when the ball was thrown.

Any snap shot, showing the end of a play, will have bunch of players wide open. Posting a pic like that and saying Dak missed a wide open receiver is not only wrong but dishonest.

 

[Zman5]

I'm not trying to be a donkey but LAST NIGHT your point WAS beasly wasn't looking back so Dak would not have thrown to him. That was your point last night and it's important that you understand that's incorrect reasoning for your future football knowledge growth as a fan.

BTW, I played DIV I football. I don't need you to worry about me about my future football knowledge. Reading some of your posts, you should pay more attention to yourself.

 

[Romotil45]

My original post was to point out the pic theogt posted was not what it appears to be. He posted a pic that showed how the field looked at the end of the play. In that pic Bease looks as wide open as Twill was on the TD play. In the pic, he is alone looking back at Dak. But if you go and watch the video, Bease is nowhere close to being as open as the pic he posted. He hasn't even turned around when the ball was thrown.

Any snap shot, showing the end of a play, will have bunch of players wide open. Posting a pic like that and saying Dak missed a wide open receiver is not only wrong but dishonest.

I disagree with your assessment. It's not dishonest the poster you speak of is a Dak fan and believes he's the future just not this year in the playoffs thats one reason I know he's not being dishonest he may be wrong but not dishonest. Although I believe he is indeed correct. I have a hard time taking your assessments because of your utter lack of football knowledge makeing statements like " Dak would not have thrown to him because he would have hit him in the back if the head" and then pretend like you never said it changing the subject etc. You loose all credibility when you do that.

 

[Zman5]

I disagree with your assessment. It's not dishonest the poster you speak of is a Dak fan and believes he's the future just not this year in the playoffs thats one reason I know he's not being dishonest he may be wrong but not dishonest. Although I believe he is indeed correct. I have a hard time taking your assessments because of your utter lack of football knowledge makeing statements like " Dak would not have thrown to him because he would have hit him in the back if the head" and then pretend like you never said it changing the subject etc. You loose all credibility when you do that.

What a surprise. Predictable answer from a Dak hater. I bet even Romo is embarrassed by people like you who want to prop Romo by busting on Dak with fake evidence.

 

[Bleu Star]

These pictures don't mean anything with sub titles. The down and distance will determine coverages. Don't forget about pressure. The Giants played great defense. On occasion Dak held on to the ball but other then a few plays, our receivers couldn't separate from the Giants defenders. Also it I should going to take a 36 year old QB with back problems at lease 5 games to find his rhythm. Dak needs tough games like this to grow!!!! Actually he played better than ELI!!!

A ray of sunshine in a **** storm. Bravo sir.

 

[Romotil45]

What a surprise. Predictable answer from a Dak hater. I bet even Romo is embarrassed by people like you who want to prop Romo by busting on Dak with fake evidence.

I'm not a Dak hater I'm very fond of the young man. I believe he's going to be our future but hes not ready this year if we didn't have a QB on the bench with so much experience and 3rd highest QBR in league history I would go with him myself. People get emotionally tied to players I get it but when your emotionally tied you loose objectivity which you clearly have. Accusing people of being haters in liers is not a good look for you sir

 

[Zman5]

I'm not a Dak hater I'm very fond of the young man. I believe he's going to be our future but hes not ready this year if we didn't have a QB on the bench with so much experience and 3rd highest QBR in league history I would go with him myself. People get emotionally tied to players I get it but when your emotionally tied you loose objectivity which you clearly have. Accusing people of being haters in liers is not a good look for you sir

It's obvious you are the one who is emotionally tied to a player. I already told you I like Romo and have been a big supporter of his. This has nothing to do with who I like as a player.

I would have made the same post if the QB was Romo in the pics posted by theogt.

 

[Romotil45]

It's obvious you are the one who is emotionally tied to a player. I already told you I like Romo and have been a big supporter of his. This has nothing to do with who I like as a player.

I would have made the same post if the QB was Romo in the pics posted by theogt.

I didn't accuse you of being a Romo hater like you acused me of being being a Dak hater. In my opinion you are emotionally tied to Zeke which clouds your analysis and lack football knowledge is evident for ALL to see. Grow up quite making personal attacks such as hater n lier makes you look childish.

 

[Zman5]

I didn't accuse you of being a Romo hater like you acused me of being being a Dak hater. In my opinion you are emotionally tied to Zeke which clouds your analysis and lack football knowledge is evident for ALL to see. Grow up quite making personal attacks such as hater n lier makes you look childish.

LOL. What? What does Zeke has to do with anything? Do you know how to read?

 

[Kevinicus]

My original post was to point out the pic theogt posted was not what it appears to be. He posted a pic that showed how the field looked at the end of the play. In that pic Bease looks as wide open as Twill was on the TD play. In the pic, he is alone looking back at Dak. But if you go and watch the video, Bease is nowhere close to being as open as the pic that was posted. He hasn't even turned around when the ball was thrown.

Any snap shot, showing the end of a play, will have bunch of players wide open. Posting a pic like that and saying Dak missed a wide open receiver is not only wrong but dishonest.

So you are arguing that Dak is not seeing the field and anticipating where receivers will be open? I won't disagree with that.

And why did you still repeat the nonsense about him not being turned around when the ball is thrown after you said you understood that happens all the time in your previous post? If the QB waits for the WR to turn and look back, he's too late.

 

[BoysfanfromCanada]

I like Dak alot believe he is the future and his future looks bright. I was fine allowing him to get as much experience as possible even when Romo was healthy I said leave him out there no need to rush Romo back because we were winning. But it's getting close to playoff time and you have to put your best team on the field. Romos just better than Dak right now so you have to play him because in the playoffs their is no tomorrow when you loose. Some might say " you don't know Romo is better" fair enough but his years of experience and 3rd highest passer rating in league history and the way he looked in 14' means you need to find out. So put him out there in find out I predict even a rusty Romo is better than Daks performance last 3 games. You have to find out. If he stinks it up you go back to Dak.

Would Romo have won all the games on the road vs Green Bay, Minnesota and Pittsburgh with his inability to move much? I don't know. Romo with his injuries is hobbled, I don't see him surviving the hits Dak has taken. Romo isn't exactly the type to throw the ball away either

 

[Romotil45]

LOL. What? What does Zeke has to do with anything? Do you know how to read?

Excuse me your correct I typed Zeke instead of Dak. No I can't read lol. See that's the kind of statement I'm talking about. Do you really think I can't read ? I though I would give you an opportunity to regain some self respect by accepting your apology for personally attacking people calling them liers n haters and admitting your " Dak couldn't throw it because he wasn't looking statement. I though you might admit you did make the statement and and admit that QBs don't wait for recievers to look back. But I over estimated you.

 

[Kevinicus]

Would Romo have won all the games on the road vs Green Bay, Minnesota and Pittsburgh with his inability to move much? I don't know. Romo with his injuries is hobbled, I don't see him surviving the hits Dak has taken. Romo isn't exactly the type to throw the ball away either

Where do you guys get this idea that Romo is this old crippled guy in a wheelchair?

 

[Romotil45]

Would Romo have won all the games on the road vs Green Bay, Minnesota and Pittsburgh with his inability to move much? I don't know. Romo with his injuries is hobbled, I don't see him surviving the hits Dak has taken. Romo isn't exactly the type to throw the ball away either

Actually he's is moving quite well these days. I get it the injury prone label sure injury is a concern going forward but his experience is what really gives him the advantage over Dak. If we had a ligit top ten defense and a pass rush you might win a playoff game with Dak if he played lights out for a Rookie. We ARE going to give up more points in the playoffs because we will be facing better offences. Dak doesn't have the experience to consistently read defenses and attach the weak points. Estimate Romo if healthy would put up 10-14 more points a game in the playoffs those are points we are going to need to win. If you go with Dak your saying we don't think we can win it all this year anyway I think thats a big mistake.

 

[Zman5]

So you are arguing that Dak is not seeing the field and anticipating where receivers will be open? I won't disagree with that.

And why did you still repeat the nonsense about him not being turned around when the ball is thrown after you said you understood that happens all the time in your previous post? If the QB waits for the WR to turn and look back, he's too late.

You are just picking on one small part of my entire post. My main point was the pic theogt posted is not close to what actually happened in the play. Go read the all post from the beginning if you want. And why are you pretending like you don't regularly post negatively about Dak?

 

[Romotil45]

Where do you guys get this idea that Romo is this old crippled guy in a wheelchair?

Not every body has the opportunity to go to Jerrys new palace in Frisco n watch them practice. It's been awhile since preseason they forget he was moving around just fine before the back injury they assume he's lost a step. But the truth is Romo still has adequate mobility. He's still more mobile than Manning was his last year and he's still more mobile than Brady. His mobility is not an issue. Truth be told the issue is what do you do if Romo wins it all then you have to sit Dak next year fans are already attached to him. Romo has always had his critics who have wanted to move on from him from the get go in 2006. Dak has invigored an African American community fan base around the country in a year full of racial tension and ratings are up after the drop off from the national anthem protests. A long of things are complicating Romos return.

 

[Zman5]

Excuse me your correct I typed Zeke instead of Dak. No I can't read lol. See that's the kind of statement I'm talking about. Do you really think I can't read ? I though I would give you an opportunity to regain some self respect by accepting your apology for personally attacking people calling them liers n haters and admitting your " Dak couldn't throw it because he wasn't looking statement. I though you might admit you did make the statement and and admit that QBs don't wait for recievers to look back. But I over estimated you.

So you accusing me of having no football knowledge isn't a personal attack? You seem have issues with selective memory.