DOUBLE WING
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,733
- Reaction score
- 5,325
The30YardSlant;4444840 said:Yes, I have been considering that throughout this thread. I've said many times I don't know what happened and the kid may have been completely innocent. The only people speaking in absolutes are you and Count. All I've said was there had to be SOMETING more for the guy to not get arrested, and it turns out I was right. Whether his story is true or not there WAS more to the story.
You were right? About what? All we know is that there was a physical altercation after this grown adult followed a kid because he was black (Let's get real here, "“For some reason he felt that Trayvon, the way that he was walking or appeared seemed suspicious to him,” = BECAUSE HE WAS BLACK).
Considering that he was apparently following this kid for no good reason and considering that we know he disobeyed police orders to leave it alone with an officer on the way, you don't have to go very far out on a limb to assume Zimmerman escalated this incident.
I'm a bit surprised no witnesses have come forward. You'd think if there was a big knockdown dragout fight, or this kid jumping on top of the guys car or something, that someone would have seen it.
This is all beside the point. You're basing all this on the assumption that a small 17 year old has no ability whatsoever to harm an adult. All that matters is that someone believe they COULD be carrying a gun or they COULD be presenting some sort of danger. How many cops, hell how many people have been shot or stabbed by teenagers in America? It numbers in the hundreds of thousands over the years. I'm not saying this kid was, but all that is relevant to my point here is that someone believe they could. How did the guy know he didnt have a gun? How did he know he didnt have anything at all?
And I agree he should have let it go, but once he didnt I have my doubts that he was there to shoot somebody.
Once again, all I can say is that you're just being naive. If he believed the kid was carrying a gun, why wouldn't he tell that to the dispatcher in the 911 call? Why wouldn't he tell police that he believed the kid was a threat to himself? Once again, THIS MAN HAD A GUN. If this kid pulled a gun out of his pocket, the man has every right to shoot. An assumption that he may have a gun in his pocket does not warrant him pulling the trigger. If he believed the kid was that big of a threat, he could have just as easily held him there at gunpoint until the cops arrived.
Of course they will, but this is assuming that all murderers are sociopaths and all family members are objective. It's also assuming that the vast, vast majority of convicted murderers have no criminal history, which is simply incorrect. I can call someone loving and caring all I want, but if they have three felonies on their record that would speak against my claim.
Just like you're assuming Zimmerman is this great, upstanding citizen?