Never waste your time arguing with a zealot. 95% of posters here know whats what.
Look, smart guy, not everybody has to believe in the 'only' yellow brick road in Oz. There are attributes for taking a franchise level quarterback, but NONE of the trump the reality of actually having one on roster in the now. Only teams desperate for this level of play, invest as high as #4 in a draft, when having a franchise quarterback, AND other prominent positional needs as well. That isn't wise, no matter how one stares into the Wicked Witch's caldron and how many flying monkies are brought out.
If YOU don't want to listen to anything else, that is on you...but on the basis of how accept only that and all others are fools. If you are truly owning the view, then own all of what YOU are trying to do as well.
It doesn't take yet another in a series of garbage insults to see, that with a quality defensive end, a quality defensive tackle, and a quality wide receiver also, this present roster would expand quite a bit as to being able to play a team level FOOTBALL.
Treat that real aspect as you wish, but when one also attaches pure garbage trash tags to suggesting a rather large list of alternative....that is on YOU.
Just for the record, NO ONE knows the status of the draft board presently. And that includes YOU or any other person so inclined to declare irrefutable insights. You simply don't.
There also is a reason why Dallas is still attending workouts for a rather large number of quarterbacks that are not in the top 2 or 3 rounds of the draft. There are reasons why this is occuring, and they don't all go to taking Wentz or Goff or Lynch at the top of the draft.
With your labeling of observations, what would that then make YOU? A strereotyping biggot?
My point is on considerations of alternatives, and yours wasn't...You have a lot of good contributions and study hard, but here, you are sharing more than that. I won't put up with that part of your insult.
Take it for what it's worth, but if you include me in a generalized bias and with insulting terms, then I'm coming for YOU. I don't approach topics on the basis of divine insight, and actually consider alternatives presented. In a discussion, one can bring up additional factors concerning subject.
In the subject of Jerry, Jason, and Tony...there has been little middle discussive ground offered...but that is on You and those tossing insult instead of discussions around.
I really don't expect Dallas to sign a defensive end, defensive tackle, or wide receiver prior to the draft. That also can be an indicator if not done....as focus is addressed more as to positional targets.
There are alot of positives involved with Wentz and Goff, but that is only part of the truth. As all avenues, including developing later round quarterbacks are on the table. A clue here, that isn't all that is involved here.
But anyone bringing out this obvious fact, but putting those facts out for discussion, doesn't include being a substandard idiot...JUST FOR THE RECORD.