mcmvp
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,359
- Reaction score
- 2,321
I wouldn’t…RBs get injured all the time. There’s a reason why they have the shortest career spans, and why most teams won’t pay big money on a second contract.That's true and that's what you really want. Even though Philly goes 4 deep you can't consistently run 4 RB's. I'd way rather have the best RB than have 4 good RBs.
Pollard is solid, but he’s not ‘great’. I would much prefer to have a strong stable of running backs…knowing that one or two of them are going to get nicked up along the way. It’s much better than the all or nothing approach.