Can anyone just answer my questions:
Why didn't the police in OH and/or FL re-open the case or demand NFL to present their findings YET?
Why didn't the accuser and her lawyer go to court based on NFL findings YET?
A multi billion dollar organization says "we have evidence this guy committed a crime" and the accuser and the authorities are doing nothing???!!!!
I mean someone please help us make sense of this
I can answer your question:
1. Police closed their investigation and the prosecutor declined to prosecute Zeke. They really don't care what is happening now. To use an old phrase, "they don't have a dog in this fight." They have plenty of criminals to chase and prosecute and are not the least bit interested in the NFL findings in a case they are done with.
2. The accuser and her lawyer have no court to go to. There is no criminal case pending in court. There is no civil case pending in court. NFL findings are against Zeke, not her. Why would she want to go to court? And, because there is no court proceeding, NOBODY can make her do or say anything.
3. The police had "evidence this guy committed a crime." 'Evidence of something' and 'proof of something' are not the same thing. Evidence can be strong or weak, credible or incredible, testimonial or scientific, or many other things, but, it is still evidence. What one person believes is strong evidence, an experienced prosecutor or defense attorney can shoot holes in. The members of the NFL panel, obviously are not experienced prosecutors or defense attorneys.
It wasn't a hearing with an NFL officer asking questions of witnesses and the player's attorney doing a cross-examination. it was a tribunal (I guess since there were four on the panel it would technically be a quabunal, if there is such a word.) The panel decided who to ask questions of, and they asked the questions. There was no cross-examination and as such there was no way the witness' credibility could be impeached. The panel decided Zeke was guilty. The most important thing to keep in mind is that this was not a hearing or trial in the way we are used to hearings or trials. Because of the way the process is set up (blame the NFLPA for allowing it) the odds are stacked against the player before it starts.
And, just to clear up a common misconception: the accuser does not have any say on whether or not prosecutors decide to prosecute a crime, or an alleged crime. She accused Zeke of assault. But, a crime, any crime, whether there is a victim or not, is a crime against the laws of the State, and only the State gets to decide whether to prosecute or not. The accuser, has no obligation to do anything and is really just another witness to be believed or disbelieved.
Long winded I reckon, but that is why the authorities and the accuser are doing nothing. This is a dispute between an employer and an employee. At this time that is all it is.