I think I'll drop this nugget here. It sounds like the NFLPA is about to bring hell down upon the NFL, which isn't surprising. However, in the link below there's a tidbit I found interesting. It sounds like the NFL really messed up in that statement they released accusing the NFLPA of "victim-shaming." According this the author's opinion, by referring the accuser as a victim, and not an alleged victim, the NFL has open themselves to be sued by Elliot for libel since there's no legal finding of Zeke's guilt therefore no victim.
“Over the past few days we’ve received multiple reports of the NFLPA spreading derogatory information to the media about the victim in Ezekiel Elliott discipline case,” the NFL said in a statement in mid-August. “It’s a common tactic to attempt to prove the innocence of the accused by discrediting the victim — in this case Ms. Thompson — when coming forward to report such abuse.”
Notice how the NFL left out “alleged” when referring to the woman claiming that Elliott abused her? Elliott was never charged in the case, which makes any stance other than claiming him to be an alleged abuser libelous in the court of law.
We can rest assured that Kessler, Elliott and the NFLPA know this full well. It will be part of what promises to be a nuclear option set forth by the Elliott camp against the NFL in court."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nf...ing-for-nuclear-option-against-nfl/ar-AAqYWCl