dallasdave
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 32,326
- Reaction score
- 88,063
That is great
Period.
That is great
Period.
Oldlaughing my other *** off?
Are you two being serious?And an entire room in her home dedicated to Giants memorabilia. She is a self described rabid fan.
Absolutely.Are you two being serious?
Are you two being serious?
I think I remember you all bringing it up when Hardy was being evaluated. Maybe I blanked it out because I can hardly believe it. That sounds almost like a conflict of interest.Yes. I read an article about her when she got the job. The two things I mentioned came right from the article. There was also a quote from a co-worker who said he doesn't know a bigger Giants fan.
I think I remember you all bringing it up when Hardy was being evaluated. Maybe I blanked it out because I can hardly believe it. That sounds almost like a conflict of interest.
Wonder why Josh Brown wasn't scrutinized more before all the media attention brought his case to light.
Yes. I read an article about her when she got the job. The two things I mentioned came right from the article. There was also a quote from a co-worker who said he doesn't know a bigger Giants fan.
No. it was never mentioned. There is a double standard. The media capital of the world and barely any coverage about the case at all until the national media became curious after the suspension.Well that alone explains the 1 game suspension of Brown. Maybe it's time to investigate the investigator. Was that even mentioned during the fallout of the Brown case?
In all seriousness a lot of us have wondered about the potential conflict of interest. And I personally find it questionable that in spite of a year of investigating (per an NFL.com article), they found almost no evidence against a Giants player. Even when the ex-wife gave them various avenues to investigate via her claims. And I found it equally questionable that when they did hand down a 1 game suspension for the Giants player, it was without fanfare and with a simple statement that he violated the league's conduct policy. The reason (truth) didn't come out until the next day when people started to clamor about the ambiguity.
I think that even if the investigator can somehow maintain her objectivity in spite of her rabid fandom, she shouldn't have to. She simply shouldn't have the job, I find it impossible to believe that they couldn't find someone equally qualified who didn't have an active rooting interest in a team. Giving the job to a person who's a die hard fan of a particular team is just unprofessional IMO.
Well that alone explains the 1 game suspension of Brown. Maybe it's time to investigate the investigator. Was that even mentioned during the fallout of the Brown case?
whaaaaaaaaaaaaa LOLI wanna roundhouse kick Mara
No, it doesn't bother me at all because that's how it works. Your employer can discipline and terminate you for things which don't rise to criminal law standards of conduct or proof.Does anyone else have a huge issue with the fact that the NFL can have investigations over something that is already legally resolved? Is that even legal for them to do?