I think you can do that with any RB in the league. If its your belief (or anyones) that we need a big bruiser like zeke and have the #1 be a bell cow then i can see where the concern is on whether tony will stay healthy. I do think his touches should be monitored. The offesne ids more explosive with him versus zeke we may lose a little down by the goal line but Tony isnt a slouch down there either hes just not zeke.While I generally don't approve of cherry picking OUT stats...I will do it sometimes just to see what one play does to them.
While I just said we rely on 2-3 big plays from tony as matter of course...I took out his 25 yard run...and looked at the average per carry. Significant difference.
Now...before anyone goes a.s. on me...I'm not using that to bash Tony. I've already expressed my satisfaction. Just an exercise to see how his big plays mix in with stats.
I do think we should take good care of tony and continue using other plays and players like Turpin and CD for example.
Blame the reason for it on who you want if it makes you feel better, but the fact still remains that Zeke 2023 is not any good and the Cowboys are better off without him in a cap worldZeke certainly did decline (you expected him to keep or beat those 1800 yard seasons? WT...)...but KM did him no favors. The TEAM ruined him. His last play as a Cowboy perfectly exemplifies it.
Explosive is not always the best. Man, you must have hated Emmit Smith.I think you can do that with any RB in the league. If its your belief (or anyones) that we need a big bruiser like zeke and have the #1 be a bell cow then i can see where the concern is on whether tony will say healthy. I do think his touches should be monitored. The offesne ids more explosive with him versus zeke we may lose a little down by the goal line but Tony isnt a slouch down there either hes just not zeke.
The pile will always go forward with zeke but Id rather lose that and gain explosiveness. I think Mccarthy and his playcalling will play a role in things
First of all no one's overreacting we're having a regular discussion here and I do understand fully I've been watching football all my life I played football I'm telling you that's exactly how Ezekiel Elliott was used with Jason Garrett and Mike McCarthy a bunch of dirty short yardage dump offs all that stuff and that's why his beverage is affected there were years where Emmett Smith only had 3.8 yards per carry over an entire season that is my point you're missing my point as equality was being called washed for doing the same thing.. It doesn't matter if he had a drop off the man had 100 times more carries than Tony Pollard and still could put up games that were 25 for 75... We're just making sure we're keeping the checks and balances here wake up you're making excuses for Tony Pollard when no one was allowing that for zekiel Elliot..I don't think you understand what MM is doing. Look at the pass plays versus the run plays. The team had 134 yards of rushing and made very little mistakes. This is the point right now as the first team gets reps in and up to speed with the new offense. We need to calm down right now and see what we have around the 49ers game.
Define effective. I'd say chewing up 42 minutes of time of possession and scoring on 80% of drives is indeed effective.That many touches in a game like that seemed really stupid, especially since the ground game wasn't really effective anyway.
My point wasn't to replace Tony Pollard it was to lower his carries that way he's fresher and he can do more tony pollard things. But Tony Pollard won't be here next year these are the very reasons why you can't pay a man this much money and he can't bring anything that's the table that's outstanding enough to paying that kind of money we're just gonna draft another running back next year....While there is room for improvement with a bell cow type of RB, Jerry and Stephen aren't disposed to spend what it would likely take to get one.
They are evidently satisfied with an offense that isn't what it might take to contend for a Super Bowl contending team. They've managed to convince themselves that they're satisfied with what they have. Paying the price for what they'd need to spend to win a SB title just isn't their plan.
Averaging 2.9 ypc means you can do that with any RB.Define effective. I'd say chewing up 42 minutes of time of possession and scoring on 80% of drives is indeed effective.
We ran 44 times, we didn't need 200 yards rushing, just chew clock up and convert 3rd downs, which we did 50% of the time.
For sure who cares about that I'm just talking about the fact is if this was Ezekiel Elliott they would call him fat slow overpaid overrated washed up and that he's holding Tony Pollard back and in fact it's not even the truth yes he was older yes his contract needed to be gone off this roster but I'm bringing up some good points here that when you're the number one back this can be what you look like when the games go like this..... Yes we were effective enough this is what you should do when you're playing in a defensive battle and you're trying to keep the game in check I like the way they're calling plays but I'm just telling you Tony Pollard will be more effective if you keep h....wn and give more carries to the other backs.Define effective. I'd say chewing up 42 minutes of time of possession and scoring on 80% of drives is indeed effective.
We ran 44 times, we didn't need 200 yards rushing, just chew clock up and convert 3rd downs, which we did 50% of the time.
Same to you.Blame the reason for it on who you want if it makes you feel better, but the fact still remains that Zeke 2023 is not any good and the Cowboys are better off without him in a cap world
I don't think that's negative, just the truth. Pollard is an explosive player....giving him too many carries, especially up the middle will take away from that explosiveness. It's a long season and we will need him to be fresh and healthy when we get to the playoffs.You shouldn’t be negative.
That wasn't the point of the ground game against a top tier defense. They moved the sticks and kept the clock running. Mission accomplished. Twice as many rushing attempts than passing attempts is a very good thing.That many touches in a game like that seemed really stupid, especially since the ground game wasn't really effective anyway.
having an offensive line that opens up holes is what gets you the yards.Zeke isnt exlusive to success in that role. I loved Emmitt ,I loved tony D and I root for all cowboys RBExplosive is not always the best. Man, you must have hated Emmit Smith.
Getting the dirty yards is what gets you to super bowls.
TY!!I don't think that's negative, just the truth. Pollard is an explosive player....giving him too many carries, especially up the middle will take away from that explosiveness. It's a long season and we will need him to be fresh and healthy when we get to the playoffs.
Yeah I always thought Zeke carried too much of the load and at the end of the Jets game I was happy seeing Tony banging his head in there when we could have had Rico or Duece doing the same.,,,Or maybe even Hunter.
Hopefully the coaches will realize the same soon.
I thought i made clear i pick cherries OUT with extreme caution...every play matters. Big plays can matter and we rely on tony doing that a couple times a game. Hes just gonna have a lot of 2-3 yard plays too.I think you can do that with any RB in the league. If its your belief (or anyones) that we need a big bruiser like zeke and have the #1 be a bell cow then i can see where the concern is on whether tony will stay healthy. I do think his touches should be monitored. The offesne ids more explosive with him versus zeke we may lose a little down by the goal line but Tony isnt a slouch down there either hes just not zeke.
The pile will always go forward with zeke but Id rather lose that and gain explosiveness. I think Mccarthy and his playcalling will play a role in things
Well obviously, you have the sense of humor of a potato. My stat was tongue in cheek. Get over yourself.When you feel the need to lie about stats....it's hate bro.