We're about to tred into truly politically incorrect waters. You won't hear any sports "journalist" theorize about this; nor any of the yahooies and yuppies who pay exhorbitant amounts of money to wave inane signs, bare their chests in freezing weather, and turn to fisticuffs when "their" team is challenged; so we'll say it for them: NFL games are fixed. Because we aren't part of the fix, and thus can't know specifically how the outcomes of games are determined in advance, we will concentrate on the most notable participants in the fix- the game officials. NFL officials are part-timers who enjoy lucrative full-time careers in other fields.
They are the most incompetent bunch imaginable; blowing call after crucial call, determining the outcome of games with a drop of their precious yellow flags, while the league grants them immunity from all criticism. Their performance over the years should have earned them the wrath of all "journalists" and "analysts" who cover NFL contests, but invariably it will be determined, during the "analysis" of various games, that the officials do a "good job" and are "actually right 99% of the time." NFL officials utilize two primary penalites which they enforce at their discretion to control the ebb and flow of each game. All "journalists" and ex- players will admit that "holding could be called on every play," and yet they never question why it is called at specific times and not at others. Pass interference is the other favorite of all officials; cited, on a wildly inconsistent basis, at important points in each contest to benefit one team and handicap the other. Like holding, there is no set standard for a pass interference infraction, with terms like "incidental contact" and speculation about whether the ball was "catchable" bandied about to keep the moronic masses distracted. Back in the 1960's, ex-Cleveland Brown defensive back Bernie Parrish wrote an excellent book entitled "They Call It A Game." In the book, he matter of factly stated, without any elaboration, that he personally had participated in many fixed games during his NFL career. He also made some interesting observations about how NFL executives purposely pick black players over white players in the high rounds of the draft, on the premise that they will be easier to negotiate with (i.e., not intelligent enough to demand more money). About a decade ago, ex-NFL defensive lineman-turned actor Bubba Smith publicly stated that Super Bowl III had been fixed. He mentioned how many times the Colts had driven down the field, only to bog down suspiciously. He brought back memories of one of the most curious plays ever; the flea- flicker call in which quarterback Earl Morrall held the ball for several seconds while a wide-open Jimmy Orr waved his arms in vain downfield. Smith's statments caused a brief furor, but it quickly subsided and no more mention was made of the subject. A few years back, NFL wide reciever Irving Fryar publicly admitted being part of an effort to throw the big college championship game between Nebraska and the University of Miami. His comments about being paid to throw a game did nothing to harm his image or his NFL career, and there was absolutely no critical examination of what he'd admitted to and what it meant to the integrity of at least that particular NCAA college football season. There have always been "chosen" teams: Vince Lombardi's Green Bay Packers in the 1960's (anyone recall Don Chandler's winning "field goal" over the Baltimore Colts, which clearly sailed wide of the uprights?); Miami, Dallas, Oakland and Pittsburgh in the 1970's; the 49ers and Commanders of the 1980s; Jimmy Johnson's Cowboys and the Broncos in the 1990's. Game commentators and other sports "journalists" will willingly admit that the better teams receive the "benefit of the doubt" from game officials. Think about that; how could that be true, if the games were honestly officiated? It's probably true that at least some players willingly participated in the "fix" during their careers, but really no player involvement is necessary. The game officials are perfectly capable, as they prove each week, of determining the outcome of each game themselves. When the NFL allowed Instant Replay several years ago, the extent of official corruption became evident very quickly. How many times did fans endure five minute delays while those in the replay booth deliberated on something any drunk fan could have accurately ruled on within fifteen seconds? In a few instances, bad calls were reversed, but all too often those in the replay booth proved just as unwilling to honestly officiate the games as those on the field. Now Instant Replay is back, in a ridiculous *******ized form, which is sure to fail and be discarded. The idea ought to be getting each call right in every instance, so that human error plays no part in the outcome of any contest. Unfortunately, the league devised a convoluted system whereby each coach has two "challenges" and if, as will undoubtedly happen, the replay officials still make the wrong call, they will be charged with a timeout. Needless to say, in such a system such challenges will not occur as often as they should. Take our advice and watch each game from the official's standpoint; if you can find any consistency in how the penalties are enforced, we'd love to have you document it and send it to us. Until then, cringe each time that yellow flags falls to the ground, because it plays a more important role in the festivities than the strategy of the coaches and the skill of the players.