ArmchairRedskin;1511378 said:
The same. We had an off year.
Did you, or was the year before an aberration?? Let's go to the record books:
2002-- 7-9
2003-- 5-11
2004-- 6-10
2005-- 10-6
2006-- 5-11
In the last 5 years, you've had 4 seasons under .500, 3 seasons with double digit losses... you've averaged fewer than 7 wins per season, and if you factor out the aberrant record of 05, you're averaging fewer than 6 wins a season...
So, was 5-11 last year REALLY an off-year, or an indication of how good or bad the Skins have been over the last 5 years??
Yeah, because you're CLEARLY on the verge of being great... LOL...
No Brunell to keep us from scoring points.
Replaced by an inexperienced quarterback who put up some pretty anemic numbers, in spite of having a very good running game, in spite of getting some good pass blocking, in spite of the Skins protecting him with some rather "safe" game plans...
Who was very good before he came to the Skins, and will probably be good for the Bears this season... this would suggest that the Skins' all-star coaching staff couldn't figure out how to use him properly...
Much like Walt Harris became a Pro Bowler one year after being one of the Skins' designated scapegoats...
Healthy Portis (not that Betts is chopped liver).
You figure the running game will be better than it was at the end of last year, do ya??
How very Pollyanna-ish of you... then again, we heard much the same thing from Skins fans last year, too-- the Skins were coming off a 10-6 record, had this savior of an offensive coordinator coming in, had loaded up on all this talent via free agency, they were on their way to GREATNESS, bay-bee...
How did THAT optimism work out for you, again??