Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,835
- Reaction score
- 103,565
Who cares about yardage? I care about wins.
Lower your own bar then. You, like others, are already making excuses.
Your diversion attempt fails.
Who cares about yardage? I care about wins.
Receivers can now choose 10-19, not just 80-89.
I think this is right.
QB/K/P: 1-19
RB : 20-49
WR : 10-19, 80-89
TE: 40-49, 80-89
OL: 50-79
DL: 50-79; 90-99
LB: 50-59; 90-99
CB/S: 20-49
This statement really honestly makes no sense whatsoever. If he averages 100 yards per game and is by extension instrumental in putting the Cowboys in the playoffs, any person with half a brain is going to say the Cowboys knocked that decision out of the ball park by taking Zeke in the first. Transversely, had the Cowboys traded back and ended up whiffing on Zeke who ultimately went to have similar success elsewhere, it would be the Moss conversation all over again.
Not "posturing" anything.
The only thing I "agree" with you about are high expectations. The bar has been set and it's been set high.
If Elliott doesn't at least outperform what McFadden did by 200 yards, he wasn't worth it.
Setting the bar as low as 1,100 is giving both he and the Cowboys an out.
Unless Elliott runs for 2500 yards a year, I will never, ever suggest he should have been taken with the 4th pick.
No one disagrees about having high expectations about EE. My point was you just echoed what I said give or take a couple of hundred yards. So essientially you did agree with me, and that's agreed without the quotes.
Supercowboy1986 said:If EE has at least 1000 yards rushing we can call it a great rookie season.. Anything else is just the icing on top.
Lower your own bar then. You, like others, are already making excuses.
Your diversion attempt fails.
What if he gets 1,500 yards and Dallas goes 12-4?
What if he rushes for 1,200 yards, but scores 20 touchdowns?
What if he rushes for 1,000 yards, but has 800 receiving yards?
Judging on rushing stats is ridiculous.
Yes, winning is a minor detail. Lol, keep firing in the dark blindfolded.
By mid-October, exactly 100 percent of our fan base will claim they wanted Zeke with the No. 4 pick.
Cowboy fans are conveniently malleable like that, and the internet is a cesspool of sudden expertism.
Yes, winning is a minor detail. Lol, keep firing in the dark blindfolded.
Bull****! Ignoring stats is ridiculous.
The bar is clearly set. He either meets it or he and the move are a failure.
We're not suddenly lowering expectations after the move has been made, despite how you and some other people would now like to, in order to somehow be proven 'right'.
If Elliott does his part and this team loses, it won't be because of him and he won't be blamed. He has his own set of expectations to live up to, and none of them includes winning or losing games single-handedly.
Your diversionary attempts again fail.
Wow, lol.
Fantasy football has really dumbed down the fan base.
You simply don't understand football. Not my responsibility to teach it to you.
By mid-October, exactly 100 percent of our fan base will claim they wanted Zeke with the No. 4 pick.
Cowboy fans are conveniently malleable like that, and the internet is a cesspool of sudden expertism.
Hardly. What I'm not doing is suddenly lowering the bar so that somehow, no matter what happens, this move looks brilliant.
The bar has been set.
Murray had 1,800 yards behind this line at the cost of a 3rd round pick and a $1.4 million salary.
McFadden has 1,100 with a 6-game late start costing $1.1 million.
Elliott cost the #4 overall pick and a salary of over $4 a year guaranteed.
The corresponding results had better be the, or no amount of Jerry-speak salesmanship or fan excuses will say otherwise.
Expectations are and should be high.
It's crystal clear which side of the argument now wants to "tap the brakes" and lower expectations.
No, I patently disagree with what you stated here:
Given the pedigree of the player, the cost, and the investment made, that's not success, that's failure.