- Messages
- 62,371
- Reaction score
- 64,100
Anything I hear or read an acceptable timeframe for present day technology and future technology, I think of the Wright Brothers, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. The Wright Brothers flew in 1903. Armstrong and Aldrin were walking on the moon in 1969. In less than seven decades, two guys were standing on the moon's surface looking back at billions of their kin on Earth.It's not really my intention to criticize the show, I just want the origin story before I can go all in. I'd probably accept whatever they offered to show how it all came about, I just want something. If the timeline started 200 years in the future, I doubt that I'd give it a second thought, because the tech 200 years from now will be so far advanced.
But I do love the show as it is, and I think Chloë Grace Moretz does a fantastic job as the protagonist, and everyone else seems like a good casting choice too, with the possible exception of Louis Herthum as Corbell Pickett. He just seems more scummy than smart, and I think the character would need to be intelligent, with an air of respectability he doesn't portray.
Literally over 99.9% of folks in 1903 didn't think technology would quickly advance that much. That's why I can just as easily accept a fictional timeframe of 70 years, seen in the show, as I can for 200 years.
Last edited: