***Official Tired of Talking TO Thread***

BARRYRAY

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,418
Reaction score
127
The lawyer in me says the union is right, they will have to pay him if he's inactive, they're trying to punish him beyond the four games, Keyshawn was sent home without pay, while you can argue about what's "right", it's more about what's legal under the collective bargaining agreement, bet they end up doing what TB did if they really don't want him back..
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,636
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Juke99 said:
On the nosey!

It's kinda silly.

Ya know, if I walk past a hammer, I don't pick it up, whack myself over the head with it and them blame it on the hammer.

If someone doesn't want to read a TO thread, it's not that difficult to simply bypass that thread.
I don't know, Juke. I've heard you like pain... ;) :p:
 

cobra

Salty *******
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
0
Juke, that is fine when there is one or two. But its getting ridiculous. We have had a good 50 threads about this one player on a forum dedicated to discussions about a team he isn't even on which exists on a website dedicated to a team that he is not nor will ever be on.

You made other forums on this website for talk about other NFL players and teams.

But this forum, designed to discuss Cowboys is awash with threads about him. It becomes increasingly difficult to sift through the noise to find threads about the team, and to be honest, we shouldn't have to sift through anything on this message board.

"Just skip it" doesn't work when it requires one to skip half the threads.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,636
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
My opinion. Don't like the threads being discussed. Create one. One that is Cowboy-related. Pretty simple to me.

Me, I'd just go find another article... :)
 

cobra

Salty *******
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
0
Juke99 said:
We extend lattitude when people want to discuss an upcoming opponent and therefore allow "non Cowboy" talk on the main forum because it is, in fact, our next opponent.

Can I infer from this comment that come next Tuesday, after the game is over, we will be deleting or moving any such "T.O. to Dallas" thread based on the reasoning you are permitting them now?

(Of course, I would vote for banning, tar and feathering, drawn and quartering, and drowning people in the sea of my burning contempt for those who post such things. But deleting and moving can do.)
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
Fletch said:
Just looking at this awesome board and I noticed 7 of the first 10 threads have either something to do with T.O. or the Iggles in general. :rolleyes:

Can't we just merge all these Iggle threads into one massive thread? Or better yet, let's just create another message board for all Iggle banter.

:bang2:

I agree...I almost created this same thread yesterday...hearing about this clown constantly and seeing thread after thread created to talk about him is real OLD

David
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
ABQCOWBOY said:
To me, this whole thing is BS. TO doesn't want to come back if he's not going to play.

Think about it. If your TO, what is the reason for practicing? Your getting paid either way so why do it? Drew Rosenhorsesass won't want him there either. Lets say Philly sticks him on the kickoff return/punt return team. TO gets hurt and what is the upside? TO gets hurt seriously and there screwed. All for what? No, this is Bovinian Scatoligy.

There will be a few more tremors before the body actually grows cold but for the most part, this thing is done IMO.

I agree I don't think he is coming back and I know the eagles are not interested in having him come back.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
BARRYRAY said:
The lawyer in me says the union is right, they will have to pay him if he's inactive, they're trying to punish him beyond the four games, Keyshawn was sent home without pay, while you can argue about what's "right", it's more about what's legal under the collective bargaining agreement, bet they end up doing what TB did if they really don't want him back..

This is more correctly about making a preemptive move against the Eagles -- they may want to recover some of TO's signing bonus -- that would be the only way the Eagles could keep money past the 4 game suspension.

and you know the union is going to fight signing bonus give backs -- regardless of the player.
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
cobra said:
Can I infer from this comment that come next Tuesday, after the game is over, we will be deleting or moving any such "T.O. to Dallas" thread based on the reasoning you are permitting them now?

(Of course, I would vote for banning, tar and feathering, drawn and quartering, and drowning people in the sea of my burning contempt for those who post such things. But deleting and moving can do.)


No...you can't infer that about a "TO to Dallas" thread....because it's still Cowboy related.

On the other hand...anything having to do with TO that is not Cowboy related, just as with any other player, should be posted in the NFL Zone.

Honestly, I don't understand what the big deal is. It's news right now...it'll vanish in a short period of time.

Is this any different that the QC vs Hutch threads that went on forever? The board was ultimatly battling over two guys who would eventually be out of the NFL. I found that MUCH more disturbing than a week's worth of TO threads.

:)
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
Juke99 said:
On the nosey!

It's kinda silly.

Ya know, if I walk past a hammer, I don't pick it up, whack myself over the head with it and them blame it on the hammer.

If someone doesn't want to read a TO thread, it's not that difficult to simply bypass that thread.

just pointing out the irony.

I've learned that irony and sarcasm need to be explicitly pointed out to some of the ijits on this board.
 

1fisher

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,777
Reaction score
120
cobra said:
Just thought I'd ask because so many star idolators seem interested in discussing a worthless slimebag instead of a team.

I thought this was cowboyszone.com; a website for the football team in Dallas.

The vast majority of the threads appear to be confused people who are fans of Madden/fantasy football/"superstars" as opposed to this team and feel it necessary to constantly discuss some scumbag who has never nor will ever be on this team.

Can we get back to discussing the team and leave the wet dreams of a bunch of kids out of it? If I wanted read that tripe, I'd go to tHuGZ.cOm or whatever crap these people read. At the very least, can we move all discussions of other players to the NFL forum instead of it cluttering here since this guy has nothing to do with the Cowboys?

Please. I, for one, would be greatly appreciative with this change.

Guess what??? You have the option to read the threads you want to read. If you don't like the subject then I suggest you don't open it!!!!!

Oh, and by the way, I have NEVER played Madden. So, I'm not one of the confused ones you referred to! Move along and read something else! :D
 

1fisher

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,777
Reaction score
120
jimmy4713 said:
There are SEVEN TO and Eagle realted threads in the forum currently. Let's not obsess over these clowns. :)

With only 26 posts it looks like you are not obsessing over anything..... :lmao2:
 

1fisher

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,777
Reaction score
120
cobra said:
Can I infer from this comment that come next Tuesday, after the game is over, we will be deleting or moving any such "T.O. to Dallas" thread based on the reasoning you are permitting them now?

(Of course, I would vote for banning, tar and feathering, drawn and quartering, and drowning people in the sea of my burning contempt for those who post such things. But deleting and moving can do.)

My suggestion would be to go to another board, :lmao2: turn on ESPN, listen to talk radio....... or shut up and move on.....
 

1fisher

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,777
Reaction score
120
TobiasEagle77 said:
Oh I'll give you some smack alright, when I'm ready to. Before the game for sure.

PT is alright with me, just a little bit odd. He's told me that he thinks I'm odd too, so I think we're OK.

To quote PT............. Bring it!!! :D
 

AtlCB

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,860
Reaction score
110
BARRYRAY said:
The lawyer in me says the union is right, they will have to pay him if he's inactive, they're trying to punish him beyond the four games, Keyshawn was sent home without pay, while you can argue about what's "right", it's more about what's legal under the collective bargaining agreement, bet they end up doing what TB did if they really don't want him back..
Keyshawn was sent home with pay. The Eagles are trying to send T.O. without pay for four weeks and are paying him his weekly paycheck afterwards even though he is inactive. T.O.'s money is guaranteed (except for four games due to suspension) whether the Eagles cut him or make him inactive.
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
abersonc said:
just pointing out the irony.

I've learned that irony and sarcasm need to be explicitly pointed out to some of the ijits on this board.


Oh, I know...I was simply agreeing.
 

stag hunter

Hater
Messages
612
Reaction score
9
joseephuss said:
Bring back T.O. Let him practice. Let him suit up for games and just don't play him.

There is precedent to pay a player to stay home. The Eagles don't have to change their minds just because Upshaw asks them.

Why would you go through the trouble of having TO around and being a distraction and then throwing out the only benefit of his presence, which is his performance on the field?
 
Top